From: Nam Nguyen on

Would continuity and uncountability

Suppose we a language L that has the ordinary semantics for
the 2-ary predicate symbol '<'. We can't formalize the concept
of continuity with a T (written in L) that has only countable
models: the models must be at least of cardinality aleph_1.

Now, however, part of continuity is discreteness. And so it
begs the question, which is that: what's the concept which
would require the models be of at least aleph_2 and of which
continuity would be a part like, again, discreteness
is a part of continuity?

--
----------------------------------------------------
There is no remainder in the mathematics of infinity.

NYOGEN SENZAKI
----------------------------------------------------
From: Nam Nguyen on
Nam Nguyen wrote:
>
> Would continuity and uncountability

(Please disregard the above. It was unintended.)

>
> Suppose we a language L that has the ordinary semantics for
> the 2-ary predicate symbol '<'. We can't formalize the concept
> of continuity with a T (written in L) that has only countable
> models: the models must be at least of cardinality aleph_1.
>
> Now, however, part of continuity is discreteness. And so it
> begs the question, which is that: what's the concept which
> would require the models be of at least aleph_2 and of which
> continuity would be a part like, again, discreteness
> is a part of continuity?


--
----------------------------------------------------
There is no remainder in the mathematics of infinity.

NYOGEN SENZAKI
----------------------------------------------------