From: Nadine Cooper on
Nevermind, I sussed it!

z2(isnan(z2)) = 0;

sorted.

Silly woman I am :)
From: Bruno Luong on
"Nadine Cooper" <f9071770(a)bournemouth.ac.uk> wrote in message <hqptmp$4j7$1(a)fred.mathworks.com>...

>
> %determine kg/m^2 -> mmHg
> z2(1,1) = (((z2(1,1)*100)/0.0720)* 0.00750061505043)
> z2(2,1) = (((z2(2,1)*100)/0.0720)* 0.00750061505043)
> z2(3,1) = (((z2(3,1)*100)/0.0720)* 0.00750061505043)
> z2(4,1) = (((z2(4,1)*100)/0.0720)* 0.00750061505043)
> z2(5,1) = (((z2(5,1)*100)/0.0720)* 0.00750061505043)
> z2(6,1) = (((z2(6,1)*100)/0.0720)* 0.00750061505043)
> z2(7,1) = (((z2(7,1)*100)/0.0720)* 0.00750061505043)
> z2(8,1) = (((z2(8,1)*100)/0.0720)* 0.00750061505043)
>

Do you really have to do it THAT way?

Bruno
From: Nadine Cooper on
"Bruno Luong" <b.luong(a)fogale.findmycountry> wrote in message <hqq6os$auj$1(a)fred.mathworks.com>...
> "Nadine Cooper" <f9071770(a)bournemouth.ac.uk> wrote in message <hqptmp$4j7$1(a)fred.mathworks.com>...
>
> >
> > %determine kg/m^2 -> mmHg
> > z2(1,1) = (((z2(1,1)*100)/0.0720)* 0.00750061505043)
> > z2(2,1) = (((z2(2,1)*100)/0.0720)* 0.00750061505043)
> > z2(3,1) = (((z2(3,1)*100)/0.0720)* 0.00750061505043)
> > z2(4,1) = (((z2(4,1)*100)/0.0720)* 0.00750061505043)
> > z2(5,1) = (((z2(5,1)*100)/0.0720)* 0.00750061505043)
> > z2(6,1) = (((z2(6,1)*100)/0.0720)* 0.00750061505043)
> > z2(7,1) = (((z2(7,1)*100)/0.0720)* 0.00750061505043)
> > z2(8,1) = (((z2(8,1)*100)/0.0720)* 0.00750061505043)
> >
>
> Do you really have to do it THAT way?
>
> Bruno

I'm a really, really awful programmer (as you can probably tell!) so for debugging I program in what I call "longhand"

But I have shortened it to:

% Convert from kg/m^2 to mmHg
l = length(z2);
i = 1;
while i <= l
z2(i) = (((z2(i)*100)/0.0720)* 0.00750061505043)
i = i+1;
end

Is that better???????? lol

I hate programming!! :)
From: Bruno Luong on
"Nadine Cooper" <f9071770(a)bournemouth.ac.uk> wrote in message <hqq7qv$s18$1(a)fred.mathworks.com>...
>
> Is that better???????? lol

Ah quantum leap, but you could also in a most natural way:

z2 = z2*(100/0.0720 * 0.00750061505043)

>
> I hate programming!! :)

You'll like it.

Bruno
From: Nadine Cooper on
"Bruno Luong" <b.luong(a)fogale.findmycountry> wrote in message <hqqevc$3h0$1(a)fred.mathworks.com>...
> "Nadine Cooper" <f9071770(a)bournemouth.ac.uk> wrote in message <hqq7qv$s18$1(a)fred.mathworks.com>...
> >
> > Is that better???????? lol
>
> Ah quantum leap, but you could also in a most natural way:
>
> z2 = z2*(100/0.0720 * 0.00750061505043)
>
> >
> > I hate programming!! :)
>
> You'll like it.
>
> Bruno

I hang my head in shame!

I'm going to bother you one last time Bruno, just because I'm curious:

probability density function is f(x)= 1/(&#963;&#8730;(2&#960; )) e(- ((x- &#956;)^2)/(2&#963;^2 ))

which is what you're doing above -

However, how does it work? I mean, so I've worked out that &#963; is 0.016, but why did you not include the sqrt2pi &#8730;(2&#960; )?

So a gaussian fit is done initially to set the peaks up, their "height" is how I think of it, with &#963; as 0.016, correlating to x values and adding the y values

and then filling in those peaks with values in relation to A

Can you do maths lectures???? I just want to fully understand the theory too, which I'm partly grasping because I'm pathetic!
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4
Prev: blood simscape
Next: neural network outputs