From: J. P. Gilliver (John) on 17 Jan 2010 07:20 In message <Xns9D02EA659903Fthanexit(a)188.40.43.245>, thanatoid <waiting(a)the.exit.invalid> writes: >"J. P. Gilliver (John)" <G6JPG(a)soft255.demon.co.uk> wrote in >news:Tkxlf0NcvaULFw3N(a)soft255.demon.co.uk: > ><SNIP> > >> more it's-amazing-it-works-at-all rather than much cop. > >"Much cop"... Is this a Brit expression I am unfamiliar with? >Please clarify. > > Sorry, I hadn't realised it might be Brit only - if indeed it is. Actually, I've only ever seen it in the negative - "not much cop"; Chambers doesn't define it. A Google search finds plenty of examples, and the following two definitions http://www.usingenglish.com/reference/idioms/not+much+cop.html http://idioms.thefreedictionary.com/be+much+cop , but they don't explain its origin. Including "not" in the search also throws up http://www.phrases.org.uk/bulletin_board/59/messages/207.html http://www.answers.com/topic/cop Anyway - the old play-sound-files-through-the-internal-speaker-when-there's-no-sound-card routines weren't very good, though startling to hear when you'd only ever heard it make beeps and clicks before. But AFAIK, nobody ever made them work even under '9x, let alone XP, as sound cards had become almost a default option, and also they required pretty full use of the processor, which the GUIs are reluctant to give up. -- J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G.5AL-IS-P--Ch++(p)Ar(a)T0H+Sh0!:`)DNAf ** http://www.soft255.demon.co.uk/G6JPG-PC/JPGminPC.htm for ludicrously outdated thoughts on PCs. ** Hit any user to continue.
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 Prev: Wow, the trolls are coming out of the woodwork again! Next: remove fragmented files |