Prev: Controlled Demolition Expert: Twin Towers and WTC7 could not possibly have been other than deliberately demolished
Next: * Hates US * admits failure in looking for his non-existent cite; PNAC of course NEVER said even remotely that it "wanted" the 9/11 attacks: COME SEE THE KOOKER FLAIL IN IMPOTENT RAGE!
From: Iarnrod on 30 Jun 2010 08:11
On Jun 30, 5:07 am, * Hates US * foamed in impotent kooker rage:
> On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 19:31:06 -0700 (PDT), Iarnrod <iarn...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> >No one ...
>
> It's obvious why you can't dispute the witnesses.

What's obvious is that you are insane since not only have I disputed
the "witnesses" but have proven that your lying claims are wrong and
physically impossible.

You disrespect the victims of 9/11 by misrepresenting what they say in
your zeal to cover for your heroes Bush and Cheeeeney.
From: Iarnrod on 30 Jun 2010 23:12
On Jun 30, 7:09 am, * Hates US * lied and foamed in impotent kooker
rage:
> They were there.

And you are misrepresenting them, fuzznuts.

> It's obvious why you can't dispute the witnesses.

Why would I dispute them, nut job? They support me and contradict you.
It is PROVEN FACT that none of them reports one single man-made
controlled demolition explosive. None.

Thus, I support them. It is you who denies them.
From: Iarnrod on 1 Jul 2010 08:15
On Jul 1, 5:17 am, * Hates US * lied and foamed in impotent kooker
rage:

> They were there.

And you are misrepresenting them, fuzznuts.

> It's obvious why you can't dispute the witnesses.

Why would I dispute them, nut job? They support me and contradict you.
It is PROVEN FACT that none of them reports one single man-made
controlled demolition explosive. None.

Thus, I support them. It is you who denies them.

It is obvious why you despise them, since the witnesses contradict you
and do not report any controlled demolition explosions. PROVEN FACT.
It must really hurt you when you realize that it undermines your Bush-
worshiping counter-disinfo campaign to know that the witnesses support
me and not you.
From: Iarnrod on 1 Jul 2010 23:08
On Jul 1, 8:20 am, * Hates US * lied and foamed in impotent kooker
rage:

> They were there.

And you are misrepresenting them, fuzznuts.

> It's obvious why you can't dispute the witnesses.

Why would I dispute them, nut job? They support me and contradict you.
It is PROVEN FACT that none of them reports one single man-made
controlled demolition explosive. None.

Thus, I support them. It is you who denies them.

It is obvious why you despise them, since the witnesses contradict you
and do not report any controlled demolition explosions. PROVEN FACT.
It must really hurt you when you realize that it undermines your Bush-
worshiping counter-disinfo campaign to know that the witnesses support
me and not you.
From: Iarnrod on 3 Jul 2010 09:52
On Jul 2, 5:07 am, * Hates US * lied and foamed in impotent kooker
rage:

> They were there.

And you are misrepresenting them, fuzznuts.

> It's obvious why you can't dispute the witnesses.

Why would I dispute them, nut job? They support me and contradict you.
It is PROVEN FACT that none of them reports one single man-made
controlled demolition explosive. None.

Thus, I support them. It is you who denies them.

It is obvious why you despise them, since the witnesses contradict you
and do not report any controlled demolition explosions. PROVEN FACT.
It must really hurt you when you realize that it undermines your Bush-
worshiping counter-disinfo campaign to know that the witnesses support
me and not you.
 |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2
Prev: Controlled Demolition Expert: Twin Towers and WTC7 could not possibly have been other than deliberately demolished
Next: * Hates US * admits failure in looking for his non-existent cite; PNAC of course NEVER said even remotely that it "wanted" the 9/11 attacks: COME SEE THE KOOKER FLAIL IN IMPOTENT RAGE!