From: firdaus janoos on 21 Jul 2010 18:57 Hello, Does anybody know if the log of the determinant of a matrix is concave in its matrix arguments ? That is, if 0< a < 1 log Det(a X_1 + (1-a) X_2 ) >= a log det(X_1) + (1-a) log det(X_2) Thanks, -fj
From: Chip Eastham on 21 Jul 2010 20:35 On Jul 21, 6:57 pm, firdaus janoos <fjan...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > Does anybody know if the log of the determinant of a matrix is concave > in its matrix arguments ? > > That is, if 0< a < 1 > > log Det(a X_1 + (1-a) X_2 ) >= a log det(X_1) + (1-a) log det(X_2) > > Thanks, > -fj Yes, log of the determinant is concave on the restricted domain of positive definite matrices. Generally, of course, it is not. regards, chip
From: fj on 21 Jul 2010 22:04 On Jul 21, 8:35 pm, Chip Eastham <hardm...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > Yes, log of the determinant is concave on > the restricted domain of positive definite > matrices. Generally, of course, it is not. > That's exactly what I'm looking for - the domain of psd matrices. Could you give me an outline (or a link) of a proof for this ? Thanks.
From: Chip Eastham on 22 Jul 2010 15:16 On Jul 21, 10:04 pm, fj <firdaus.jan...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Jul 21, 8:35 pm, Chip Eastham <hardm...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Yes, log of the determinant is concave on > > the restricted domain of positive definite > > matrices. Generally, of course, it is not. > > That's exactly what I'm looking for - the domain of psd matrices. > Could you give me an outline (or a link) of a proof for this ? > > Thanks. See the solution in the last exercise here: http://www.ifor.math.ethz.ch/teaching/lectures/ot_as09/solution5 As you might guess from the formulation you've given above: > log Det(a X_1 + (1-a) X_2 ) >= a log det(X_1) + (1-a) log det(X_2) proving concavity can be reduced to consideration of log Det applied to a line between any two positive definite matrices, so in essence this is a one-dimensional computation. [Note that the positive definite domain of matrices is convex and sometimes referred to as a "cone".] regards, chip
|
Pages: 1 Prev: Generalization of Fermat's Little Theorem! Next: Rueckgrat von Wirklichkeit |