From: Tom Lane on 21 Oct 2009 12:46 "David E. Wheeler" <david(a)kineticode.com> writes: > FWIW, I think that this is a bug, and that the variation from the text > version will be unexpected. I recommend fixing it for 8.4.2. Well, it's certainly a bug, but I don't think it's back-patchable. A back-patch will not affect existing installations anyway. What it will do is break user code that is expecting the existing behavior (for instance, Rod's index). I think it's something we can only change at a major version boundary. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
From: Tom Lane on 21 Oct 2009 12:48 "David E. Wheeler" <david(a)kineticode.com> writes: > Is there a straight-foward way to check such a thing > programmatically, with a query perhaps? Or should I just put aside an > hour to do an audit? I was wondering whether you could query pg_proc to look for functions with the same name and different arguments/results. It's a bit tricky though because you'd expect s/citext/text/ in at least some positions (maybe not all)? regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
From: "David E. Wheeler" on 21 Oct 2009 12:53 On Oct 21, 2009, at 9:48 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > I was wondering whether you could query pg_proc to look for functions > with the same name and different arguments/results. It's a bit tricky > though because you'd expect s/citext/text/ in at least some positions > (maybe not all)? Yeah, almost all. I'll poke around, though it might be a day or two Best, David -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Prev: [HACKERS] Privileges and inheritance Next: Hot standby status |