Cpp Complier
in [Ruby]
|
Prev: Logger's sync and flush returns NoMethod error
Next: Return nothing when looking outside the bounds of 2D array?
From: Tony Arcieri on 14 Jul 2010 16:42 [Note: parts of this message were removed to make it a legal post.] On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 2:13 PM, Allan Davis <javaalley(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Passenger currently does not have a windows version. I was thinking of > trying to work on that. See if that would improve our environment. Hey member of the NetBeans Dream Team guy, you considered using JRuby on Windows? :) -- Tony Arcieri Medioh! A Kudelski Brand
From: Ammar Ali on 14 Jul 2010 16:54 [Note: parts of this message were removed to make it a legal post.] On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 11:03 PM, andrew mcelroy <sophrinix(a)gmail.com>wrote: > > Surely there has to be an llvm compiler for windows. > It depends on what you are using it for. > Interesting. The last time I tried to pass ruby's code through clang it choked on the __asm__ keywords in vm.c. I admit that it was a half hearted effort and I didn't try to figure out if there were options that would make it work. I hope to give it another try soon. Do you know of any documented successful compilations on linux? Thanks, Ammar
From: Ammar Ali on 14 Jul 2010 16:57 [Note: parts of this message were removed to make it a legal post.] On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 11:54 PM, Ammar Ali <ammarabuali(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 11:03 PM, andrew mcelroy <sophrinix(a)gmail.com>wrote: > >> >> Surely there has to be an llvm compiler for windows. >> It depends on what you are using it for. >> > > Interesting. The last time I tried to pass ruby's code through clang it > choked on the __asm__ keywords in vm.c. I admit that it was a half hearted > effort and I didn't try to figure out if there were options that would make > it work. I hope to give it another try soon. Do you know of any documented > successful compilations on linux? > > Thanks, > Ammar > > That should have been vm_exec.c, not vm.c
From: andrew mcelroy on 14 Jul 2010 17:03 On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 3:57 PM, Ammar Ali <ammarabuali(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 11:54 PM, Ammar Ali <ammarabuali(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 11:03 PM, andrew mcelroy <sophrinix(a)gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> >>> Surely there has to be an llvm compiler for windows. >>> It depends on what you are using it for. >>> >> >> Interesting. The last time I tried to pass ruby's code through clang it >> choked on the __asm__ keywords in vm.c. I admit that it was a half hearted >> effort and I didn't try to figure out if there were options that would make >> it work. I hope to give it another try soon. Do you know of any documented >> successful compilations on linux? >> It's not Linux, but it might work. http://joneslee85.wordpress.com/2010/04/23/howto-compile-ruby-1-9-2-head-with-clang-svn-head-on-mac-os-x-10-6-3/ Andrew McElroy tryruby.org >> Thanks, >> Ammar >> >> > That should have been vm_exec.c, not vm.c >
From: David Masover on 15 Jul 2010 00:45
On Wednesday, July 14, 2010 02:55:11 pm Allan Davis wrote: > I am trying to figure out which would be the best C++ compiler to install > on my system. I am forced to develop on windows for my job, and I wanted > to look into developing a ruby extension and apache mod. I'm sure you know, but in case you don't, Ruby runs well enough on Windows without Apache, and there are dozens of other webservers you could use. If Apache is a requirement, you could still stick Ruby server(s) behind it. > I was debating between cygwin, mingw or ms cpp express. Can someone give > me a best recomendation? Visual C++, according to this page: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/platform/win_compiling.html More generally, it depends how portable the code you're working with is, and how much work you're willing to do to make it "native". MS CPP produces the most native, probably best and fastest binaries with the fewest third-party dependencies, while Cygwin installs an entire third-party Unix subsystem. Where I've seen mingw used, it's a nice, happy medium -- a beautiful example is Git for Windows, which packs everything you need to get a Bash prompt with a functional Git (and git-gui, and gitk) into under 12 megs. That's including all kinds of stuff like less, grep, vim, tar/bzip2, OpenSSH... It basically feels like Cygwin lite. But if you can make it work with Visual C++, go with that. |