Crankfest!
in [Math]
|
Prev: manipulating spectral norm of matrix with normalized columns
Next: Exchange of the "oracle machine" and the "oracle" in the polynomial-time hierachy
From: Jesse F. Hughes on 9 Jun 2010 07:47 WM <mueckenh(a)rz.fh-augsburg.de> writes: > On 9 Jun., 12:57, stevendaryl3...(a)yahoo.com (Daryl McCullough) wrote: > >> The antidiagonal is not equal to any of the numbers on the list. >> What is unclear about that? > > It is unclear how this can be accomplished in the binary tree with > countably many different paths which contains all numbers by > definition. It is an actual crankfest, with all sorts of longtime absent eccentrics joining in the fun! JSH! Tony Orlow! WM! Whee! Someone might want to pass the word on to the few stragglers still not around. Let's see who's missing. Newberry David Petry Ross Finlayson Who else? Especially long ago folks? (Note to LWalker: Yes, I've identified certain folks as being cranks, or at least having mathematically eccentric notions. I realize that makes me a very bad person. I think I can live with that.) -- "I am a force of Nature. Time is a friend of mine, and We talk about things, here and there. And sometimes We muse a bit [...] and then We watch them go... in the meantime, Time and I, We play with some of them, at least for a little while." --- JSH and His pal, Time. |