From: "Dave "Crash" Dummy" on
*microsoft.public.scripting.vbscript* is living on borrowed time, and I
hate web based forums. Where do we go from here? I know it is possible
to create a new Usenet group, but I don't know how. I wish someone with more
experience would step in.
--
Crash

Ignorance is curable. Stupidity is refusing treatment.
From: Mike B on
The Classic VB groups are seeking safe haven in the comp.lang.* existing
groups. There seems to be some people there that know the procedure for new
group creation. The m.p.vb.general.discussion group is still up as of right
now, but already one of the Access NGs is gone from a couple hours ago.



"Dave "Crash" Dummy" <invalid(a)invalid.invalid> wrote in message
news:oAPMn.72320$304.66311(a)newsfe12.iad...
> *microsoft.public.scripting.vbscript* is living on borrowed time, and I
> hate web based forums. Where do we go from here? I know it is possible
> to create a new Usenet group, but I don't know how. I wish someone with
> more
> experience would step in.
> --
> Crash
>
> Ignorance is curable. Stupidity is refusing treatment.


From: Todd Vargo on
Mike B wrote:
> The Classic VB groups are seeking safe haven in the comp.lang.* existing
> groups. There seems to be some people there that know the procedure for
> new group creation. The m.p.vb.general.discussion group is still up as of
> right now, but already one of the Access NGs is gone from a couple hours
> ago.
>
>
>
> "Dave "Crash" Dummy" <invalid(a)invalid.invalid> wrote in message
> news:oAPMn.72320$304.66311(a)newsfe12.iad...
>> *microsoft.public.scripting.vbscript* is living on borrowed time, and I
>> hate web based forums. Where do we go from here? I know it is possible
>> to create a new Usenet group, but I don't know how. I wish someone with
>> more
>> experience would step in.

I don't like reading forums through a browser because I end up downloading
and reading the same information over and over. Unlike a newsreader which
sets a subject as read, a forum does not keep track of items I have already
read. OTOH, we have topicality/netiquette discussions so many times that
perhaps it's for the better that Microsoft disassociate their top posting
induced format from newsgroups.

Just my 2 cents.

--
Todd Vargo

(Post questions to group only. Remove "z" to email personal messages)

From: Mayayana on
| *microsoft.public.scripting.vbscript* is living on borrowed time, and I
| hate web based forums. Where do we go from here?

Rumor has it that the groups will stay up. I don't
really understand how this works myself, but from
what I've been able to gather, the nature of NNTP
is distributed. There isn't really a location for a given
group. So.....

* Microsoft will probably send out a message to delete
the groups when they're dropped from the MS server, but
all they're really doing is discontinuing hosting of the
groups on their own server.

* Any NNTP host has a choice as to whether they want
to acknowledge that request, if it is sent.

* Some hosts will keep hosting the groups.

* A discussion in the VB group led to this link:
http://www.eternal-september.org/

It's a free news server that intends to keep hosting
the groups. You just open an account and set up
your news reader to get this, or any other, newsgroup
from that host.



From: Mayayana on
Confirming this solution. I'm posting this via
http://www.eternal-september.org/

Other groups that MS has dropped are available
via E-S. They're also still available via some (many?)
other private news servers and ISPs. The nice thing
about that is that people looking for the MS groups
will still probably find them as long as they don't look
for them on msnews.microsoft.com.

For anyone currently using the msnews server:
This might be a good time to make the switch.
Some of the groups have already disappeared. The
WMI and VB.API groups are already gone from the
MS server.