Critical vulnerability found in Adobe again
in [Viruses]
|
From: Dustin Cook on 8 Jun 2010 20:52 "David H. Lipman" <DLipman~nospam~@Verizon.Net> wrote in news:humaip0ku3(a)news1.newsguy.com: > From: "Dustin Cook" <bughunter.dustin(a)gmail.com> > > > >| With respect, I don't agree with the assesment. And if I did somehow >| lose credibility for this nonsense, it's not from people I respect >| anyway. > > > Your replies are not "helping" your case :-( I assume it's because you and several others feel I'm adding to the signal to noise ratio in a negative fashion; Sadly, that is a side effect of this .... terrible flood. I apologize to those affected by it. -- A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject -Winston Churchill
From: "FromTheRafters" erratic on 8 Jun 2010 21:25 "Dustin Cook" <bughunter.dustin(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:Xns9D91D4604A3AFHHI2948AJD832(a)69.16.185.247... > "David H. Lipman" <DLipman~nospam~@Verizon.Net> wrote in > news:humaip0ku3(a)news1.newsguy.com: > >> From: "Dustin Cook" <bughunter.dustin(a)gmail.com> >> >> >> >>| With respect, I don't agree with the assesment. And if I did somehow >>| lose credibility for this nonsense, it's not from people I respect >>| anyway. >> >> >> Your replies are not "helping" your case :-( > > I assume it's because you and several others feel I'm adding to the signal > to noise ratio in a negative fashion; Sadly, that is a side effect of this > ... terrible flood. I apologize to those affected by it. It's hard to not respond to its lies. Every time it brings up that Rebecca post and misattributes it to you I'm tempted to repost the direct link to *that* post with the headers that proves it wrong. Lying in the face of proof of truth is typical behavior for this thief.
From: Dustin Cook on 8 Jun 2010 22:34 "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <rhondaleakirk(a)earthling.net> wrote in news:humqnp$mf2$1(a)news.eternal-september.org: > Yeah, and I told him to stop. Once. Maybe twice. Then I stopped adding > to the noise. I was using the fact he used one of yours as a point, It's none of my business really anything beyond that. You have your reasons for requesting he stop and you don't need for any reason to share them with me. I like things just the way they are between us. We're civil and only chat to one another on an extremely rare basis. This works for the both of us. You extended friendship once, and I abused it; So you certainly owe me no favors of any kind here. >> Now go away. > > If you went away, the flooding of the group would stop. If you would > stop answering every anonymous post, the flooding would be greatly > lessened. The group was mass flooded when I was rarely even posting anymore; Short of checking google, I can't even say I was posting on a routine basis or had been for months, as I got a bit burned out on the malware thing for awhile. I tell you what, I'll just go away, as you suggest, and we'll see what happens with this group and that of others. If it all stops, great. Glad for all of you. If that's the way you feel, I'll walk away from your alls little place in the lunchroom. > Instead, your narcissism has led you to destroy the group for the sake > of your pathetic but overblown ego. Please stop wasting my time or yours by placing psycho babble labels on me collected solely from what little you've read about me on usenet. Ok? It just makes us both look stupid. > It's not like I'm the only one telling you to stop. Get a clue. As I said above, I'll completely stop posting to usenet for awhile, then, after a few weeks when anonymous remailer continues, I'll ask you what else you think might make him go away. It's a sad day when someone can be punked into leaving a place because others can't simply use a killfilter tho... But, I'll do as you request for now. Have a good day. -- A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject -Winston Churchill
From: CiderScratter on 9 Jun 2010 01:19 On Tue, 8 Jun 2010 21:25:13 -0400, "FromTheRafters" <erratic @nomail.afraid.org> wrote: >It's hard to not respond to its lies. Every time it brings up that Rebecca >post and misattributes it to you I'm tempted to repost the direct link to >*that* post with the headers that proves it wrong. How do you feel about the other posts? I see the same as you. Just the one misattributed posts in a mass of correct ones.
From: "FromTheRafters" erratic on 9 Jun 2010 08:30
"CiderScratter" <cider-scratter(a)hotmail.invalid> wrote in message news:1v8u065vtamej4mhhvhiltop55e7n2md7q(a)4ax.com... > On Tue, 8 Jun 2010 21:25:13 -0400, "FromTheRafters" <erratic > @nomail.afraid.org> wrote: > >>It's hard to not respond to its lies. Every time it brings up that Rebecca >>post and misattributes it to you I'm tempted to repost the direct link to >>*that* post with the headers that proves it wrong. > > How do you feel about the other posts? > I see the same as you. Just the one misattributed posts in a mass of > correct ones. In a previous post, I likened usenet to an RPG like Leisure Suit Larry. RAiD was an online persona, I can't think of any reason to accept those as "real" even though they are "genuine" posts. The internet was not "real" for many people - it was a place to live out a fantasy, especially when there was a feeling that anonymity was possible *and* everlasting. Of course now, the internet is more *real* for people than actual reality is - consider the rise in cyber-bullying and the young people commiting suicide over writing on their "wall". I feel even the genuine posts are being used by the spammer to mislead the public IOW they are "lies" in that they are being portrayed as *real*. It is obvious to most of us that Dustin had 'turned over a new leaf' so to speak (ten years ago) and bringing up those posts (with accompanying 'color commentary') is just as disengenuous as repeatedly bringing up the missattributed post by Rebecca. Judging by current behavior, Dustin seems much more trustworthy than PCButts does. For all I know, PCButts may have been a trustworthy person ten years ago - it is their behavior *now* that counts. |