From: Jeroen Belleman on 8 Oct 2009 02:46 harry wrote: > > > Unfortunately the relationship between ampere turns and the magnetic > flux generated is not linear. Ie doubling ampere turns does not > double the flux. Also, at some point, the magnetic material > "saturates" and you can add as many ampere turns as you like but flux > will not increase. You may try to sell that argument to our magnet builders here at CERN. ;-) How do you think they get to 10 Teslas? Jeroen Belleman
From: pom on 8 Oct 2009 04:42 Jeroen Belleman a écrit : > harry wrote: >> >> >> Unfortunately the relationship between ampere turns and the magnetic >> flux generated is not linear. Ie doubling ampere turns does not >> double the flux. Also, at some point, the magnetic material >> "saturates" and you can add as many ampere turns as you like but flux >> will not increase. > > You may try to sell that argument to our magnet builders here > at CERN. ;-) How do you think they get to 10 Teslas? > > Jeroen Belleman Hi! well, exactly by NOT using ferromagnetic core materials. POM
From: Jeroen Belleman on 8 Oct 2009 05:11 pom wrote: > Jeroen Belleman a �crit : >> harry wrote: >>> >>> >>> Unfortunately the relationship between ampere turns and the magnetic >>> flux generated is not linear. Ie doubling ampere turns does not >>> double the flux. Also, at some point, the magnetic material >>> "saturates" and you can add as many ampere turns as you like but flux >>> will not increase. >> >> You may try to sell that argument to our magnet builders here >> at CERN. ;-) How do you think they get to 10 Teslas? >> >> Jeroen Belleman > Hi! > well, exactly by NOT using ferromagnetic core materials. > POM Are you suggesting that the presence of ferromagnetic core materials *prevents* you from going there? Jeroen Belleman
From: JosephKK on 8 Oct 2009 07:58 On Wed, 07 Oct 2009 07:33:55 -0700, John Larkin <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: >On Wed, 07 Oct 2009 06:58:16 -0700, >"JosephKK"<quiettechblue(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > >>On Sun, 04 Oct 2009 11:26:47 -0700, John Larkin >><jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: >> >>>On Sun, 4 Oct 2009 11:12:36 -0700, "Speeders & Drunk Drivers are >>>MURDERERS" <xeton2001(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >>> >>>> <snip> >>> >>>You really don't understand magnetics or engineering units, do you? >>> >>>The mag field through an electromagnet of constant reluctance is >>>proportional to the number of ampere-turns pumped into the coil. >>> >>>Double the amps for fixed turns, get twice the field. >>> >>>Double the turns for fixed amps, ditto. >>> >>>The engineering unit here is ampere-turns, formally (amps * turns) and >>>NOT amps/turn. >>> >>>Try working out some numerical examples and see if any light dawns. >>>But don't neglect your English homework. >>> >>>John >>> >> >>Please do not assign drunk driver's errors to JF who has tried to >>correct them. Click, click, you are down two notches in my estimate >>of you JL. > >1. I have no idea what you're talking about > >and > >2. I don't give a FF about your notches or your estimates. > >John It was a quite direct reply to your immediately preceding post. Too bad you cannot read very well. Not that i expect you to give a damn about anything except how many sycophants you can gather around yourself.
From: Jan Panteltje on 8 Oct 2009 08:38 On a sunny day (Thu, 08 Oct 2009 08:46:48 +0200) it happened Jeroen Belleman <jeroen(a)nospam.please> wrote in <hak1s3$kue$1(a)aioe.org>: >harry wrote: >> >> >> Unfortunately the relationship between ampere turns and the magnetic >> flux generated is not linear. Ie doubling ampere turns does not >> double the flux. Also, at some point, the magnetic material >> "saturates" and you can add as many ampere turns as you like but flux >> will not increase. > >You may try to sell that argument to our magnet builders here >at CERN. ;-) How do you think they get to 10 Teslas? They dont, it blew up.
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 Prev: Quick connect/disconnect crimp terminals Next: Need heater strip circuit |