Prev: WMI to use or not to use
Next: VB6 on Windows 7 64-Bit
From: Paul Clement on 20 Jan 2010 14:48
On Thu, 14 Jan 2010 20:11:31 -0600, "Ralph" <nt_consulting64(a)yahoo.com> wrote:

� >
� > DCOM (Network OLE) was the pre-cursor to (MTS) COM+ and provided the
� network communication
� > infrastructure for interaction with COM+ services. COM+ is simply an
� enhanced serviced-based version
� > born out of the DCOM architecture.
� >
�
� What an absolutely bizarre post. The only thing you got right was "DCOM"
� came before "COM+". (Then of course, "network communication infrastructure
� for interaction" can probably be construed to mean just about anything. <g>)
�
� The fact it is nonsense doesn't really matter as it isn't germane to the
� topic at hand, but I'm actually curious why someone would even feel the need
� to post such silliness?
�
� -ralph
�

Well you called it bizarre, nonsense and silly but offered no substantive explanation.

I don't see any reason to get bent out of shape over my explanation. In fact you were the one who
(pedantically) brought this up and I was simply pointing out that these technologies are not the
same. One implements technology from the other but they don't provide the same functionality.


Paul
~~~~
Microsoft MVP (Visual Basic)
First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Prev: WMI to use or not to use
Next: VB6 on Windows 7 64-Bit