DM Candidate?
in [Relativity]
|
Prev: instructor solution manual for Digital Communications Fundamentals and Applications 2e Bernard Sklar
Next: SR/GR use absolute time to synchronize the GPS clocks with the ground clock.
From: eric gisse on 17 Mar 2010 18:55 Simple Simon wrote: > eric gisse wrote: >> Simple Simon wrote: >> >>> Is it possible that some of the dark matter is simply matter that is >>> outside of our past light cone but gravitationally bound to objects >>> within it? >> >> No. > > /!y?/ Given that every observation that indicates dark matter takes place within our light cone, what do YOU think?
From: "Juan R." González-Álvarez on 18 Mar 2010 16:52 Simple Simon wrote on Wed, 17 Mar 2010 05:31:25 -0800: > Juan R. González-Álvarez wrote: >> Simple Simon wrote on Tue, 16 Mar 2010 12:46:06 -0800: >> >>> Is it possible that some of the dark matter is simply matter that is >>> outside of our past light cone but gravitationally bound to objects >>> within it? >> >> No. > > You seem to be quantumly entangled with eric gisse. No please... we repel!!!! > But just in case > you're not, I'll repeat my response to him: > > Why not? Because DM have special properties that are not in ordinary matter. If you study the properties of DM you will see why you have given absolutely no candidate :-D -- http://www.canonicalscience.org/ BLOG: http://www.canonicalscience.org/publications/canonicalsciencetoday/canonicalsciencetoday.html
From: BURT on 18 Mar 2010 17:53 On Mar 18, 1:52 pm, "Juan R." González-Álvarez <nowh...(a)canonicalscience.com> wrote: > Simple Simon wrote on Wed, 17 Mar 2010 05:31:25 -0800: > > > Juan R. González-Álvarez wrote: > >> Simple Simon wrote on Tue, 16 Mar 2010 12:46:06 -0800: > > >>> Is it possible that some of the dark matter is simply matter that is > >>> outside of our past light cone but gravitationally bound to objects > >>> within it? > > >> No. > > > You seem to be quantumly entangled with eric gisse. > > No please... we repel!!!! > > > But just in case > > you're not, I'll repeat my response to him: > > > Why not? > > Because DM have special properties that are not in ordinary > matter. If you study the properties of DM you will see why you have given > absolutely no candidate :-D > > --http://www.canonicalscience.org/ > > BLOG:http://www.canonicalscience.org/publications/canonicalsciencetoday/ca... If DM makes up most of the mass of the universe fhe Earth and us should be made primarily by it. But we find it nowhere on Earth or in the solar system. There is another explanation of why there are fast orbits at the outskirts of the galaxies. Mitch Raemsch
From: buenno on 18 Mar 2010 18:56
On Mar 17, 11:36 pm, Tom Roberts <tjrob...(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: > buenno wrote: > > On Mar 17, 4:52 pm, Tom Roberts <tjrob...(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: > >> Simple Simon wrote: > >>> Tom Roberts wrote: > >>>> Simple Simon wrote: > >>>>> Is it possible that some of the dark matter is simply matter that is > >>>>> outside of our past light cone but gravitationally bound to objects > >>>>> within it? > >>>> No. It is not possible for such matter to REMAIN outside our past > >>>> lightcone. > >> [...] > > > are you just saying that dark matter does not > > exists? > > No. I'm just saying that Simple Simon's supposition is not possible within the > models we have today (GR). > > Tom Roberts nothing can be outside the cone? |