From: 0dbell on 25 Jun 2007 12:41 I noticed in the setup section of the WinDDK samples that in addition to the latest setup support tools for driver install/uninstall (DIFx, DPInst), devcon is included as well. So far, devcon seems to work fine for me, so I am not sure whether it is worth it for me to switch right now to DPInst. I vaguely remember reading something about DPInst supporting Vista while previous tools don't. Is this true? I am missing the "history" part of the evolution: Does DPInst *replace* devcon, or is it simply a fancier (GUI etc.) of the same API? Thanks, Don
From: Eliyas Yakub [MSFT] on 27 Jun 2007 13:16 When it comes to driver installation DPInst replaces Devcon.exe. This page summarizes all the virtues of DPinst http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms790308.aspx. -Eliyas <0dbell(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:1182789706.713364.154720(a)j4g2000prf.googlegroups.com... >I noticed in the setup section of the WinDDK samples that in addition > to the latest setup support tools for driver install/uninstall (DIFx, > DPInst), devcon is included as well. > > So far, devcon seems to work fine for me, so I am not sure whether it > is worth it for me to switch right now to DPInst. > > I vaguely remember reading something about DPInst supporting Vista > while previous tools don't. Is this true? > > I am missing the "history" part of the evolution: Does DPInst > *replace* devcon, or is it simply a fancier (GUI etc.) of the same > API? > > Thanks, > Don >
From: 0dbell on 28 Jun 2007 12:05 Thank you, Eliyas. I just needed this little clarification before delving into the material - and you just provided it. Thanks. Don On Jun 27, 1:16 pm, "Eliyas Yakub [MSFT]" <eliy...(a)online.microsoft.com> wrote: > When it comes to driver installation DPInst replaces Devcon.exe. This page > summarizes all the virtues of DPinsthttp://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms790308.aspx. > > -Eliyas > > <0db...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > news:1182789706.713364.154720(a)j4g2000prf.googlegroups.com... > > > > >I noticed in the setup section of the WinDDK samples that in addition > > to the latest setup support tools for driver install/uninstall (DIFx, > > DPInst), devcon is included as well. > > > So far, devcon seems to work fine for me, so I am not sure whether it > > is worth it for me to switch right now to DPInst. > > > I vaguely remember reading something about DPInst supporting Vista > > while previous tools don't. Is this true? > > > I am missing the "history" part of the evolution: Does DPInst > > *replace* devcon, or is it simply a fancier (GUI etc.) of the same > > API? > > > Thanks, > > Don- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -
|
Pages: 1 Prev: OID_IP4_OFFLOAD_STATS Next: Using net stop\start from command window |