From: Mladen Gogala on
louis.szarzec(a)ggzdrenthe.nl wrote:

> Mon Aug 25 11:44:11 2008
> Database in quiesce mode
> Mon Aug 25 11:48:39 2008
> Thread 1 advanced to log sequence 3081 (LGWR switch)
> Current log# 2 seq# 3081 mem# 0: /oradata/xmcp/redo02.log
> Current log# 2 seq# 3081 mem# 1: /oradata/xmcp/redo02b.log
> Current log# 2 seq# 3081 mem# 2: /oradata/xmcp/redo02c.log
> Mon Aug 25 11:50:29 2008
> Database out of quiesce mode
>

Have the other occurrences happened at the roughly same time? If so, there
might be a batch job doing that. Quiesce mode is useful when doing BCV
split. Do you have anything like that?

--
http://mgogala.freehostia.com
From: joel garry on
On Aug 25, 3:25 am, "Shakespeare" <what...(a)xs4all.nl> wrote:
> "Mladen Gogala" <mgog...(a)yahoo.com> schreef in berichtnews:48b16e63$0$15596$834e42db(a)reader.greatnowhere.com...
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Sat, 23 Aug 2008 21:19:36 +0200, Shakespeare wrote:
>
> >> I have a client using 10.2.0.4 64 bit on AIX. After an upgrade from 9 to
> >> 10, his database went (after running for about 15 hours) into quiesce
> >> mode without anyone specifically performing such an action.
> >> (Unfortunately, no more specific data available right now; only thing he
> >> noticed in the alert log was a log writer switch on redo01.log when this
> >> happened).
> >> After a while, his db went unquiesce again. I searched docs, metalink,
> >> Google but did not find a clue why a DB would do this all by itself. A)
> >> Is this possible anyway?
> >> B) What could cause this?
>
> >> Thanks,
>
> >> Shakespeare
>
> > Something like that should be recorded in the alert log. Posting the
> > relevant information from the alert log would certainly help people on
> > this group during the diagnostic process.
>
> > --
> >http://mgogala.freehostia.com
>
> This is the part of the alert log:
>
> > Mon Aug 25 11:21:09 2008
> > Thread 1 advanced to log sequence 3080 (LGWR switch)
> >  Current log# 3 seq# 3080 mem# 0: /oradata/xmcp/redo03.log
> >  Current log# 3 seq# 3080 mem# 1: /oradata/xmcp/redo03b.log
> >  Current log# 3 seq# 3080 mem# 2: /oradata/xmcp/redo03c.log
> > Mon Aug 25 11:44:11 2008
> > Database in quiesce mode
> > Mon Aug 25 11:48:39 2008
> > Thread 1 advanced to log sequence 3081 (LGWR switch)
> >  Current log# 2 seq# 3081 mem# 0: /oradata/xmcp/redo02.log
> >  Current log# 2 seq# 3081 mem# 1: /oradata/xmcp/redo02b.log
> >  Current log# 2 seq# 3081 mem# 2: /oradata/xmcp/redo02c.log
> > Mon Aug 25 11:50:29 2008
> > Database out of quiesce mode
>
> Thanks,
> Shakespeare

Wondering if Note:559298.1 is a clue - perhaps something is obscurely
associated with quiescing. The timing looks very suspicious to me.

jg
--
@home.com is bogus.
"There are few things as obsolete as an obsolete race car." Ken
Miles, 1958
From: Palooka on
joel garry wrote:
> The timing looks very suspicious to me.
Indeed. Clearly it is the same alert log.

Palooka
From: Shakespeare on

"Palooka" <nobody(a)nowhere.com> schreef in bericht
news:eGDsk.87911$6s4.87430(a)newsfe14.ams2...
> joel garry wrote:
>> The timing looks very suspicious to me.
> Indeed. Clearly it is the same alert log.
>
> Palooka

It IS the same. Both me and my client DBA posted on this group...;-) without
noticing we were both posting the same issue.....

Shakespeare


From: Shakespeare on

"joel garry" <joel-garry(a)home.com> schreef in bericht
news:15ab9b7b-d291-4120-a15c-fc3ff59049c5(a)w39g2000prb.googlegroups.com...
On Aug 25, 3:25 am, "Shakespeare" <what...(a)xs4all.nl> wrote:
> "Mladen Gogala" <mgog...(a)yahoo.com> schreef in
> berichtnews:48b16e63$0$15596$834e42db(a)reader.greatnowhere.com...
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Sat, 23 Aug 2008 21:19:36 +0200, Shakespeare wrote:
>
> >> I have a client using 10.2.0.4 64 bit on AIX. After an upgrade from 9
> >> to
> >> 10, his database went (after running for about 15 hours) into quiesce
> >> mode without anyone specifically performing such an action.
> >> (Unfortunately, no more specific data available right now; only thing
> >> he
> >> noticed in the alert log was a log writer switch on redo01.log when
> >> this
> >> happened).
> >> After a while, his db went unquiesce again. I searched docs, metalink,
> >> Google but did not find a clue why a DB would do this all by itself. A)
> >> Is this possible anyway?
> >> B) What could cause this?
>
> >> Thanks,
>
> >> Shakespeare
>
> > Something like that should be recorded in the alert log. Posting the
> > relevant information from the alert log would certainly help people on
> > this group during the diagnostic process.
>
> > --
> >http://mgogala.freehostia.com
>
> This is the part of the alert log:
>
> > Mon Aug 25 11:21:09 2008
> > Thread 1 advanced to log sequence 3080 (LGWR switch)
> > Current log# 3 seq# 3080 mem# 0: /oradata/xmcp/redo03.log
> > Current log# 3 seq# 3080 mem# 1: /oradata/xmcp/redo03b.log
> > Current log# 3 seq# 3080 mem# 2: /oradata/xmcp/redo03c.log
> > Mon Aug 25 11:44:11 2008
> > Database in quiesce mode
> > Mon Aug 25 11:48:39 2008
> > Thread 1 advanced to log sequence 3081 (LGWR switch)
> > Current log# 2 seq# 3081 mem# 0: /oradata/xmcp/redo02.log
> > Current log# 2 seq# 3081 mem# 1: /oradata/xmcp/redo02b.log
> > Current log# 2 seq# 3081 mem# 2: /oradata/xmcp/redo02c.log
> > Mon Aug 25 11:50:29 2008
> > Database out of quiesce mode
>
> Thanks,
> Shakespeare

Wondering if Note:559298.1 is a clue - perhaps something is obscurely
associated with quiescing. The timing looks very suspicious to me.

jg
--
@home.com is bogus.
"There are few things as obsolete as an obsolete race car." Ken
Miles, 1958


============================================
I'll check the note!

Shakespeare