From: guskz on 26 Jun 2010 18:19 On Jun 26, 1:36 pm, Robert Higgins <robert_higgins...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > On Jun 25, 3:04 am, "gu...(a)hotmail.com" <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > De Walls, > > You can't even spell "van der Waals" interactions, let alone > understand them. > > >and London are forces from dipole moments of charge. London > > [snipped rest of nonsense] Look up the word de waals then dipole, then go back to school little girl.
From: guskz on 26 Jun 2010 18:21 On Jun 26, 6:19 pm, "gu...(a)hotmail.com" <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > On Jun 26, 1:36 pm, Robert Higgins <robert_higgins...(a)hotmail.com> > wrote: > > > On Jun 25, 3:04 am, "gu...(a)hotmail.com" <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > De Walls, > > > You can't even spell "van der Waals" interactions, let alone > > understand them. > > > >and London are forces from dipole moments of charge. London > > > [snipped rest of nonsense] > > Look up the word de waals then dipole, then go back to school little > girl. and it's der waals.
From: guskz on 26 Jun 2010 18:26 On Jun 26, 1:36 pm, Robert Higgins <robert_higgins...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > On Jun 25, 3:04 am, "gu...(a)hotmail.com" <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > De Walls, > > You can't even spell "van der Waals" interactions, let alone > understand them. > > >and London are forces from dipole moments of charge. London > > [snipped rest of nonsense] Look up the word der waals & dipole, then go back to school little girl.
From: guskz on 26 Jun 2010 18:26 On Jun 26, 1:36 pm, Robert Higgins <robert_higgins...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > On Jun 25, 3:04 am, "gu...(a)hotmail.com" <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > De Walls, > > You can't even spell "van der Waals" interactions, let alone > understand them. > > >and London are forces from dipole moments of charge. London > > [snipped rest of nonsense] I think magnum is looking for u.
From: Robert Higgins on 26 Jun 2010 18:32 On Jun 26, 6:19 pm, "gu...(a)hotmail.com" <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > On Jun 26, 1:36 pm, Robert Higgins <robert_higgins...(a)hotmail.com> > wrote: > > > On Jun 25, 3:04 am, "gu...(a)hotmail.com" <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > De Walls, > > > You can't even spell "van der Waals" interactions, let alone > > understand them. > > > >and London are forces from dipole moments of charge. London > > > [snipped rest of nonsense] > > Look up the word de waals then dipole, then go back to school little > girl. I'm not a girl - not like you would know what to do with one, anyway. "Van der Waals" forces are named for a physicist,; it's not "de Walls", or "de waals". God, you're stupid.
First
|
Prev
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 Prev: Relativity Error Next: Aunt Al plays pool with LHC's proton collider |