From: geoff on
Franc Zabkar wrote:
> On Sun, 7 Mar 2010 16:21:35 +1100, "David L. Jones"
> <altzone(a)gmail.com> put finger to keyboard and composed:
>
>> The title says it all really.
>> See what happens when I try to destroy Fluke's new 28-II Multimeter:
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qlA7-fh5nDQ
>>
>> Dave.
>
> My AUD$3K Fluke PM97 failed from normal use. The batteries wouldn't
> hold a charge from day 1,

And you didn't send it back ?!!

geoff


From: kreed on
On Mar 8, 12:13 am, "Mark Zacharias" <mark_zachar...(a)sbclobal.net>
wrote:
> "Jan Panteltje" <pNaonStpealm...(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:hn0430$v62$1(a)news.albasani.net...
>
> > On a sunny day (Sun, 7 Mar 2010 16:21:35 +1100) it happened "David L.
> > Jones"
> > <altz...(a)gmail.com> wrote in <BJGkn.72617$K81.22...(a)newsfe18.iad>:
>
> >>The title says it all really.
> >>See what happens when I try to destroy Fluke's new 28-II Multimeter:
> >>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qlA7-fh5nDQ
>
> > Well, why bother, I have a 5 Euro multimeter,
> > if it blows I will get an other 5 Euro multimeter.
> > But it says it is 100% protected.
> > Why burn so many $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$? Just for the show???
> > Makes no sense to me.
>
> If you had seen some of his earlier videos, you'd know why. By all means use
> your cheaper meter if you like, but there is such a thing as, "measurement
> confidence". If your work is important, perhaps with lots of money or even
> someone's life potentially at stake, which meter would I rather rely on? I
> think the answer is pretty obvious.
> I own meters large and small, el cheapos and better ones. But when I really
> need to know, right now and with no bullshit, I reach for the Fluke.
>
> Mark Z.


Agree.

I have had a fluke 87 for about 15 years, it has never let me down. It
has survived drops, rough conditions and other abuse that happens in
the trade. The only thing I have ever done is replace the probes once,
and a fuse when I accidentally blew it once - and that is NOT the
meter's fault.
I cannot be stuck with dodgy equipment when I'm on a job 200km from
the workshop. Been there, done that, when I started out many years
ago.

To me, the cost of time and money and goodwill by having to go back
would be excess of the cost of a decent meter.


I wouldn't hesitate to buy another, and Dave's reviews have confirmed
my belief in their products. I can see also where the internal design
has been improved a lot.

Im not just pushing Fluke products either, while I havent used or seen
them, due to industry competition, Im sure that HP, TEK and others
have made comparable quality meters.


From: kreed on
On Mar 9, 12:54 am, "Nial Stewart"
<nial*REMOVE_TH...(a)nialstewartdevelopments.co.uk> wrote:
> > The title says it all really.
> > See what happens when I try to destroy Fluke's new 28-II Multimeter:
> >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qlA7-fh5nDQ
> > Dave.
>
> Dave,
>
> You should make what was left the prize in a competition.
>
> Nial

Wonder if you could return it under warranty ? ;)
From: ehsjr on
David L. Jones wrote:
> The title says it all really.
> See what happens when I try to destroy Fluke's new 28-II Multimeter:
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qlA7-fh5nDQ
>
> Dave.

Amazing. I doubted the 3M drop spec. Not any more.

Ed
From: Franc Zabkar on
On Sun, 7 Mar 2010 16:44:21 -0800, "William Sommerwerck"
<grizzledgeezer(a)comcast.net> put finger to keyboard and composed:

>> My AUD$3K Fluke PM97 failed from normal use. The batteries
>> wouldn't hold a charge from day 1, the AC adapter failed after
>> only a short time, one of the probes failed soon after, and then
>> the meter itself failed.
>
>Then why wasn't it repaired/replaced under warranty?

I bought it in Australia, but I took it to Singapore. I suppose I
could have made the effort to have the batteries replaced, but I
relied on the AC adapter, until it failed.

- Franc Zabkar
--
Please remove one 'i' from my address when replying by email.
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6
Prev: Cheap potting alternative
Next: TL431 stability