Prev: ARE EVOLUTIONISTS AFRAID OF ED CONRAD?
Next: Things to Reject in 21st Century Physics
From: Bob Ezergailis on 3 Jul 2010 17:45
The deepwater Horizon disaster, resulting in BP's massive oil spill
into the Gulf of Mexico brings to mind the high probability that a
different geophysical theory needs to be explored concerning the
"crude oil" and gas that is spewing from the well head. It is 5000
feet beneath the surface of the ocean, and it is somewhere between
18,000 and 23,000 feet beneath that that the "oil" and gas deposit is
located. Deeper wells have been drilled, up to somewhere in the area
of 35,000 feet beneath the surface of our world.

I believe that the chemical soup, of hydrocarbons, chemicals and
gases, is not "crude oil" as most people are taught to think of it.
There is a difference in origin and nature between this chemical soup
that is spewing into the Gulf and the "crude oil" coming from shallow
deposits and from the cooking of oil bearing shale. The latter is
believed to come from the decomposition of life, primarily plant life,
and that is the most probable answer for most shallow deposits as well
as oil from shale. The deep wells are different and this well in the
Gulf gives emphasis to that difference. The well appears to be tapping
into a primordial soup of chemicals and gases that has more in common
with some of the lessons that we are learning about extra terrestrial
bodies where mixtures of hydrocarbon and various gases are being
detected. The "crude oil" is more likely a primordial hydrocarbon soup
that goes back to the formative stages of the planets evolution, and
not at all the product of a vast mass of rotted vegetation. That there
is something cyclical about an origin in a primordial hydrocarbon
soup, where life probably springs from at its inception, and the
return of life forms to shallow oil deposits should not surprise us.
Life comes from it and life, given certain geophysical conditions,
life returns to it.

That the massive deposit of hydrocarbon soup that Deepwater Horizon
drilled into, unleashing a "geological monster" is the sort of
primordial soup, comprised of a chemistry more consistent with that
fact than shallow wells produce, also indicates that it is much, much
older than the products of shallow wells. It may go back to the
formation of the world, long before there was any life on it, and it
may be the very originating source of all life as we know it.

Robert Ezergailis
Hamilton, Canada
From: Androcles on 3 Jul 2010 18:13

"Bob Ezergailis" <bobezergailis(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:a1b6da3b-9a70-4084-9451-810b18fbabb2(a)k39g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
| The deepwater Horizon disaster, resulting in BP's massive oil spill
| into the Gulf of Mexico brings to mind the high probability that a
| different geophysical theory needs to be explored concerning the
| "crude oil" and gas that is spewing from the well head. It is 5000
| feet beneath the surface of the ocean, and it is somewhere between
| 18,000 and 23,000 feet beneath that that the "oil" and gas deposit is
| located. Deeper wells have been drilled, up to somewhere in the area
| of 35,000 feet beneath the surface of our world.
|
| I believe that the chemical soup, of hydrocarbons, chemicals and
| gases, is not "crude oil" as most people are taught to think of it.
| There is a difference in origin and nature between this chemical soup
| that is spewing into the Gulf and the "crude oil" coming from shallow
| deposits and from the cooking of oil bearing shale. The latter is
| believed to come from the decomposition of life, primarily plant life,
| and that is the most probable answer for most shallow deposits as well
| as oil from shale. The deep wells are different and this well in the
| Gulf gives emphasis to that difference. The well appears to be tapping
| into a primordial soup of chemicals and gases that has more in common
| with some of the lessons that we are learning about extra terrestrial
| bodies where mixtures of hydrocarbon and various gases are being
| detected. The "crude oil" is more likely a primordial hydrocarbon soup
| that goes back to the formative stages of the planets evolution, and
| not at all the product of a vast mass of rotted vegetation. That there
| is something cyclical about an origin in a primordial hydrocarbon
| soup, where life probably springs from at its inception, and the
| return of life forms to shallow oil deposits should not surprise us.
| Life comes from it and life, given certain geophysical conditions,
| life returns to it.
|
| That the massive deposit of hydrocarbon soup that Deepwater Horizon
| drilled into, unleashing a "geological monster" is the sort of
| primordial soup, comprised of a chemistry more consistent with that
| fact than shallow wells produce, also indicates that it is much, much
| older than the products of shallow wells. It may go back to the
| formation of the world, long before there was any life on it, and it
| may be the very originating source of all life as we know it.
|
| Robert Ezergailis
| Hamilton, Canada
|
And what evidence do you have for your highly improbable conjecture,
given that molten rock is pouring from Eyjafjallaj�kull, that Everest is
6 miles above sea level and you are only looking at a depth of 3 miles?

From: bert on 4 Jul 2010 18:17
On Jul 3, 6:13 pm, "Androcles" <Headmas...(a)Hogwarts.physics_z> wrote:
> "Bob Ezergailis" <bobezergai...(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:a1b6da3b-9a70-4084-9451-810b18fbabb2(a)k39g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
> | The deepwater Horizon disaster, resulting in BP's massive oil spill
> | into the Gulf of Mexico brings to mind the high probability that a
> | different geophysical theory needs to be explored concerning the
> | "crude oil" and gas that is spewing from the well head. It is 5000
> | feet beneath the surface of the ocean, and it is somewhere between
> | 18,000 and 23,000 feet beneath that that the "oil" and gas deposit is
> | located. Deeper wells have been drilled, up to somewhere in the area
> | of 35,000 feet beneath the surface of our world.
> |
> | I believe that the chemical soup, of hydrocarbons, chemicals and
> | gases, is not "crude oil" as most people are taught to think of it.
> | There is a difference in origin and nature between this chemical soup
> | that is spewing into the Gulf and the "crude oil" coming from shallow
> | deposits and from the cooking of oil bearing shale. The latter is
> | believed to come from the decomposition of life, primarily plant life,
> | and that is the most probable answer for most shallow deposits as well
> | as oil from shale. The deep wells are different and this well in the
> | Gulf gives emphasis to that difference. The well appears to be tapping
> | into a primordial soup of chemicals and gases that has more in common
> | with some of the lessons that we are learning about extra terrestrial
> | bodies where mixtures of hydrocarbon and various gases are being
> | detected. The "crude oil" is more likely a primordial hydrocarbon soup
> | that goes back to the formative stages of the planets evolution, and
> | not at all the product of a vast mass of rotted vegetation. That there
> | is something cyclical about an origin in a primordial hydrocarbon
> | soup, where life probably springs from at its inception, and the
> | return of life forms to shallow oil deposits should not surprise us.
> | Life comes from it and life, given certain geophysical conditions,
> | life returns to it.
> |
> | That the massive deposit of hydrocarbon soup that Deepwater Horizon
> | drilled into, unleashing a "geological monster" is the sort of
> | primordial soup, comprised of a chemistry more consistent with that
> | fact than shallow wells produce, also indicates that it is much, much
> | older than the products of shallow wells. It may go back to the
> | formation of the world, long before there was any life on it, and it
> | may be the very originating source of all life as we know it.
> |
> | Robert Ezergailis
> | Hamilton, Canada
> |
> And what evidence do you have for your highly improbable conjecture,
> given that molten rock is pouring from Eyjafjallaj kull, that Everest is
> 6 miles above sea level and you are only looking at a depth of 3 miles?

What if shrimp are radioactive? What if this deep well had a blowout
because radioactive elements have created great heat and thus
pressure. Will BP coverup that it has made the Gulf waters
radioactive? We know they are big on lies. TreBert PS Red Lobster
not serving shrimp Hmmm
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: ARE EVOLUTIONISTS AFRAID OF ED CONRAD?
Next: Things to Reject in 21st Century Physics