From: Mike Jones on 30 Apr 2010 11:18 Piggy-backing on Paweł Wlaź: >> I have tried to alter the /etc/profile.d/lang.sh in the hope that one >> of them took their config from there, but that did not seem to help. > > I previously used iso, now I have switched to utf8. The only thing I had > to change was settings in /etc/profile.d/lang.sh I just (re)set my /etc/profile.d/lang.sh to en_GB.utf8 and everything seems ok so far, except if I open MC in RXVT I get garbled texty stuff around everything except the actual dir\file names. If I open MC in xterm everything is ok. RXVT seems to work ok otherwise, Lynx is fine, scripts echo to screen ok, etc. Just MC looking like somebody spilled alphabetti- spaghetti all over it in RXVT. Is this an RXVT glitch maybe, or MC? -- *=( http://www.thedailymash.co.uk/ *=( For all your UK news needs.
From: Chick Tower on 1 May 2010 15:22 On 2010-04-30, Mike Jones <luck(a)dasteem.invalid> wrote: > I just (re)set my /etc/profile.d/lang.sh to en_GB.utf8 and everything > seems ok so far, except if I open MC in RXVT I get garbled texty stuff > around everything except the actual dir\file names > ... > Just MC looking like somebody spilled alphabetti- > spaghetti all over it in RXVT. > > Is this an RXVT glitch maybe, or MC? > I play around with Arch Linux, and on their forums they say rxvt doesn't properly handle UTF-8. There's a modified rxvt called urxvt that supposedly handles it, but I you would probably have to compile it yourself, unless it's on SlackBuilds.Org. Chick Tower For e-mail: aols2 dot echo dot towerboy at xoxy dot net
From: Mike Jones on 1 May 2010 18:31 Responding to Chick Tower: > On 2010-04-30, Mike Jones <luck(a)dasteem.invalid> wrote: >> I just (re)set my /etc/profile.d/lang.sh to en_GB.utf8 and everything >> seems ok so far, except if I open MC in RXVT I get garbled texty stuff >> around everything except the actual dir\file names ... >> Just MC looking like somebody spilled alphabetti- spaghetti all over it >> in RXVT. >> >> Is this an RXVT glitch maybe, or MC? >> >> > I play around with Arch Linux, and on their forums they say rxvt doesn't > properly handle UTF-8. There's a modified rxvt called urxvt that > supposedly handles it, but I you would probably have to compile it > yourself, unless it's on SlackBuilds.Org. > I was wondering why it is most of my other console apps worked ok, and just MC's periferal details got garbled. I've flipped back to ISO-8859-1 for now as xterm (ok with UTF-8) does strange things with my custom fastkeys. 8| -- *=( http://www.thedailymash.co.uk/ *=( For all your UK news needs.
From: Eef Hartman on 2 May 2010 08:10 Mike Jones <luck(a)dasteem.invalid> wrote: > I've flipped back to ISO-8859-1 for now as xterm (ok with UTF-8) does > strange things with my custom fastkeys. 8| You may want to change over to ISO 8859-15, the somewhat extended version of -1. From its man page: > The ISO 8859 standard includes several 8-bit extensions to the ASCII > character set (also known as ISO 646-IRV). Especially important is ISO > 8859-1, the "Latin Alphabet No. 1", which has become widely implemented > and may already be seen as the de-facto standard ASCII replacement. > However, it lacks the EURO symbol and does not fully cover Finnish and > French. ISO 8859-15 is a modification of ISO 8859-1 that covers these > needs. -- ******************************************************************* ** Eef Hartman, Delft University of Technology, dept. SSC/ICT ** ** e-mail: E.J.M.Hartman(a)tudelft.nl - phone: +31-15-278 82525 ** *******************************************************************
From: Mike Jones on 2 May 2010 12:06 Responding to Eef Hartman: > Mike Jones <luck(a)dasteem.invalid> wrote: >> I've flipped back to ISO-8859-1 for now as xterm (ok with UTF-8) does >> strange things with my custom fastkeys. 8| > > You may want to change over to ISO 8859-15, the somewhat extended > version of -1. From its man page: >> The ISO 8859 standard includes several 8-bit extensions to the ASCII >> character set (also known as ISO 646-IRV). Especially important is ISO >> 8859-1, the "Latin Alphabet No. 1", which has become widely implemented >> and may already be seen as the de-facto standard ASCII replacement. >> However, it lacks the EURO symbol and does not fully cover Finnish and >> French. ISO 8859-15 is a modification of ISO 8859-1 that covers these >> needs. Makes sense, but... I only seem to have en_GB and en_GB.utf8 according to locale -a Or have I missed something? -- *=( http://www.thedailymash.co.uk/ *=( For all your UK news needs.
|
Pages: 1 Prev: stealth domain Next: SlackBuild or package or tips for popbsmtp aka pop-before-smtp |