From: Monica on
I've always used Window's defrag program. This is adequate or can I/Should
I be using something better?
A newsletter I got today mentioned a program called UltraDefrag. It's free
so maybe it's worth what it costs <g>
What would you guys suggest?
Thanks,
Monica


From: Sam on

"Monica" <reese(a)iluvlabs.com> wrote in message
news:Iggen.52084$zN4.14092(a)newsfe05.iad...
> I've always used Window's defrag program. This is adequate or can
> I/Should I be using something better?
> A newsletter I got today mentioned a program called UltraDefrag. It's
> free so maybe it's worth what it costs <g>
> What would you guys suggest?
> Thanks,
> Monica
>
Have a look at MyDefrag, formerly called JKDefrag.
You can google it, read and see what you think.
I have used for more than two years am well pleased.
It is also free.


From: Christopher Muto on
Monica wrote:
> I've always used Window's defrag program. This is adequate or can I/Should
> I be using something better?
> A newsletter I got today mentioned a program called UltraDefrag. It's free
> so maybe it's worth what it costs <g>
> What would you guys suggest?
> Thanks,
> Monica
>
>

windows 7 and vista have disk defragmentation built in and schedualed to
run weekly by default. you can also perform manual scans or change the
schedual under start-allprograms-acessories-systemtools-diskdefragmenter.
but disk defragmentation is really a throw back to when disks were both
slow and small. not much performance gained is achieved from the
process on modern disks in regular workstation setting.
From: Monica on
Thanks Sam. No, I haven't looked at any of them yet. I've known there are
other programs out there that are supposed to do a better job than the MS
program but just continued to use MS' defrag. The article in the newsletter
just got me thinking I need to look into this. I'll look at MyDefrag.

"Sam" <jj3010(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:MFgen.80337$JE2.8110(a)newsfe09.iad...
>
> "Monica" <reese(a)iluvlabs.com> wrote in message
> news:Iggen.52084$zN4.14092(a)newsfe05.iad...
>> I've always used Window's defrag program. This is adequate or can
>> I/Should I be using something better?
>> A newsletter I got today mentioned a program called UltraDefrag. It's
>> free so maybe it's worth what it costs <g>
>> What would you guys suggest?
>> Thanks,
>> Monica
>>
> Have a look at MyDefrag, formerly called JKDefrag.
> You can google it, read and see what you think.
> I have used for more than two years am well pleased.
> It is also free.
>


From: RnR on
On Mon, 15 Feb 2010 13:18:06 -0600, "Monica" <reese(a)iluvlabs.com>
wrote:

>Thanks Sam. No, I haven't looked at any of them yet. I've known there are
>other programs out there that are supposed to do a better job than the MS
>program but just continued to use MS' defrag. The article in the newsletter
>just got me thinking I need to look into this. I'll look at MyDefrag.
>
>"Sam" <jj3010(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:MFgen.80337$JE2.8110(a)newsfe09.iad...
>>
>> "Monica" <reese(a)iluvlabs.com> wrote in message
>> news:Iggen.52084$zN4.14092(a)newsfe05.iad...
>>> I've always used Window's defrag program. This is adequate or can
>>> I/Should I be using something better?
>>> A newsletter I got today mentioned a program called UltraDefrag. It's
>>> free so maybe it's worth what it costs <g>
>>> What would you guys suggest?
>>> Thanks,
>>> Monica
>>>
>> Have a look at MyDefrag, formerly called JKDefrag.
>> You can google it, read and see what you think.
>> I have used for more than two years am well pleased.
>> It is also free.
>>
>


I just tried MyDefrag and it not only wouldn't complete the process
but messed up a program or two. I uninstalled it. Actually many say
now that Defrags aren't necessary due to the inherit speed of the
drives today vs. years ago. I'm beginning to believe them now whereas
before I was more open minded.