Prev: Dell Inspiron 1720 Sound Skip Problems With All Music Players
Next: Possible to add HDMI outout to Optiplex 780?
From: Monica on 15 Feb 2010 13:21 I've always used Window's defrag program. This is adequate or can I/Should I be using something better? A newsletter I got today mentioned a program called UltraDefrag. It's free so maybe it's worth what it costs <g> What would you guys suggest? Thanks, Monica
From: Sam on 15 Feb 2010 13:48 "Monica" <reese(a)iluvlabs.com> wrote in message news:Iggen.52084$zN4.14092(a)newsfe05.iad... > I've always used Window's defrag program. This is adequate or can > I/Should I be using something better? > A newsletter I got today mentioned a program called UltraDefrag. It's > free so maybe it's worth what it costs <g> > What would you guys suggest? > Thanks, > Monica > Have a look at MyDefrag, formerly called JKDefrag. You can google it, read and see what you think. I have used for more than two years am well pleased. It is also free.
From: Christopher Muto on 15 Feb 2010 14:17 Monica wrote: > I've always used Window's defrag program. This is adequate or can I/Should > I be using something better? > A newsletter I got today mentioned a program called UltraDefrag. It's free > so maybe it's worth what it costs <g> > What would you guys suggest? > Thanks, > Monica > > windows 7 and vista have disk defragmentation built in and schedualed to run weekly by default. you can also perform manual scans or change the schedual under start-allprograms-acessories-systemtools-diskdefragmenter. but disk defragmentation is really a throw back to when disks were both slow and small. not much performance gained is achieved from the process on modern disks in regular workstation setting.
From: Monica on 15 Feb 2010 14:18 Thanks Sam. No, I haven't looked at any of them yet. I've known there are other programs out there that are supposed to do a better job than the MS program but just continued to use MS' defrag. The article in the newsletter just got me thinking I need to look into this. I'll look at MyDefrag. "Sam" <jj3010(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message news:MFgen.80337$JE2.8110(a)newsfe09.iad... > > "Monica" <reese(a)iluvlabs.com> wrote in message > news:Iggen.52084$zN4.14092(a)newsfe05.iad... >> I've always used Window's defrag program. This is adequate or can >> I/Should I be using something better? >> A newsletter I got today mentioned a program called UltraDefrag. It's >> free so maybe it's worth what it costs <g> >> What would you guys suggest? >> Thanks, >> Monica >> > Have a look at MyDefrag, formerly called JKDefrag. > You can google it, read and see what you think. > I have used for more than two years am well pleased. > It is also free. >
From: RnR on 15 Feb 2010 15:48
On Mon, 15 Feb 2010 13:18:06 -0600, "Monica" <reese(a)iluvlabs.com> wrote: >Thanks Sam. No, I haven't looked at any of them yet. I've known there are >other programs out there that are supposed to do a better job than the MS >program but just continued to use MS' defrag. The article in the newsletter >just got me thinking I need to look into this. I'll look at MyDefrag. > >"Sam" <jj3010(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message >news:MFgen.80337$JE2.8110(a)newsfe09.iad... >> >> "Monica" <reese(a)iluvlabs.com> wrote in message >> news:Iggen.52084$zN4.14092(a)newsfe05.iad... >>> I've always used Window's defrag program. This is adequate or can >>> I/Should I be using something better? >>> A newsletter I got today mentioned a program called UltraDefrag. It's >>> free so maybe it's worth what it costs <g> >>> What would you guys suggest? >>> Thanks, >>> Monica >>> >> Have a look at MyDefrag, formerly called JKDefrag. >> You can google it, read and see what you think. >> I have used for more than two years am well pleased. >> It is also free. >> > I just tried MyDefrag and it not only wouldn't complete the process but messed up a program or two. I uninstalled it. Actually many say now that Defrags aren't necessary due to the inherit speed of the drives today vs. years ago. I'm beginning to believe them now whereas before I was more open minded. |