Prev: IExplorer open minimised
Next: Cheese
From: SG1 on 27 Apr 2010 16:12 Is there a free alternative to M$ defragmenter as per XP. It is soooo slow. Comments about not needing to defragment are not encouraged Roddles.
From: . on 27 Apr 2010 16:48 "SG1" <lostitall(a)the.races> wrote in message news:CyHBn.94356$kj3.79664(a)newsfe08.iad... > Is there a free alternative to M$ defragmenter as per XP. It is soooo > slow. Go to sleep while you`re waiting! Did you defag your swap? page defrag or bootvis ?
From: SG1 on 27 Apr 2010 17:49 "." <.@.com> wrote in message news:T4IBn.21794$pv.6314(a)news-server.bigpond.net.au... > > > "SG1" <lostitall(a)the.races> wrote in message > news:CyHBn.94356$kj3.79664(a)newsfe08.iad... > > >> Is there a free alternative to M$ defragmenter as per XP. It is soooo >> slow. > > Go to sleep while you`re waiting! > > Did you defag your swap? > > page defrag > > or > bootvis > > ? All 3 with boot taking the longest, it is also the smallest.
From: z1 on 27 Apr 2010 18:48 SG1 wrote: > Is there a free alternative to M$ defragmenter as per XP. It is soooo slow. > Comments about not needing to defragment are not encouraged Roddles. > > > take a look at this: http://www.iobit.com/iobitsmartdefrag.html
From: SG1 on 27 Apr 2010 19:04
"z1" <z1(a)127.0.0.1> wrote in message news:kaidnf52-YFL9ErWnZ2dnUVZ_ridnZ2d(a)netspace.net.au... > SG1 wrote: >> Is there a free alternative to M$ defragmenter as per XP. It is soooo >> slow. Comments about not needing to defragment are not encouraged >> Roddles. >> >> >> > > take a look at this: > http://www.iobit.com/iobitsmartdefrag.html Installed looks good. Liked the look with the "old Norton" style. Zipped thru the rest of boot disk that I gave up on with M$. |