From: Michael on 12 Apr 2010 17:35 There's some information I'll be sure to use in the future. :-) -- "Don't pick a fight with an old man. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you." "Bob I" <birelan(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message news:eDdR1fn2KHA.5212(a)TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... > the 0176 is correct for "degree", the 0186 is actually the "masculine > ordinal indicator" > > Michael wrote: >> 186 is bigger. I'm not sure which one is correct. >> � � >> >
From: BillyBob on 12 Apr 2010 22:26 Am I correct in assuming that the masculine ordinal indicator is measured in inches ? Example: � � � � etc. BB "Bob I" <birelan(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message news:eDdR1fn2KHA.5212(a)TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... the 0176 is correct for "degree", the 0186 is actually the "masculine ordinal indicator" Michael wrote: > 186 is bigger. I'm not sure which one is correct. > � � >
From: Steve Rindsberg on 13 Apr 2010 10:26 In article <48308446-E40B-4C79-80B2-2023163CCD10(a)microsoft.com>, BillyBob wrote: > Am I correct in assuming that the masculine ordinal indicator is measured in > inches ? By optimists, yes. For realists, cm. Pessimists, mm.
From: Bob I on 13 Apr 2010 12:13 Steve Rindsberg wrote: > In article <48308446-E40B-4C79-80B2-2023163CCD10(a)microsoft.com>, BillyBob > wrote: > >>Am I correct in assuming that the masculine ordinal indicator is measured in >>inches ? > > > By optimists, yes. > > For realists, cm. > > Pessimists, mm. > Typists, points?
From: Steve Rindsberg on 13 Apr 2010 16:04 In article <us7QHRy2KHA.2284(a)TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl>, Bob I wrote: > Steve Rindsberg wrote: > > > In article <48308446-E40B-4C79-80B2-2023163CCD10(a)microsoft.com>, BillyBob > > wrote: > > > >>Am I correct in assuming that the masculine ordinal indicator is measured in > >>inches ? > > > > > > By optimists, yes. > > > > For realists, cm. > > > > Pessimists, mm. > > > Typists, points? Or art directors. Yep.
First
|
Prev
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 Prev: powerpoint slides for training in child protection Next: Thunking spooler |