From: Michael on
There's some information I'll be sure to use in the future. :-)

--


"Don't pick a fight with an old man.
If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you."


"Bob I" <birelan(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:eDdR1fn2KHA.5212(a)TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> the 0176 is correct for "degree", the 0186 is actually the "masculine
> ordinal indicator"
>
> Michael wrote:
>> 186 is bigger. I'm not sure which one is correct.
>> � �
>>
>
From: BillyBob on
Am I correct in assuming that the masculine ordinal indicator is measured in
inches ?

Example: � � � � etc.

BB

"Bob I" <birelan(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:eDdR1fn2KHA.5212(a)TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
the 0176 is correct for "degree", the 0186 is actually the "masculine
ordinal indicator"

Michael wrote:
> 186 is bigger. I'm not sure which one is correct.
> � �
>


From: Steve Rindsberg on
In article <48308446-E40B-4C79-80B2-2023163CCD10(a)microsoft.com>, BillyBob
wrote:
> Am I correct in assuming that the masculine ordinal indicator is measured in
> inches ?

By optimists, yes.

For realists, cm.

Pessimists, mm.



From: Bob I on


Steve Rindsberg wrote:

> In article <48308446-E40B-4C79-80B2-2023163CCD10(a)microsoft.com>, BillyBob
> wrote:
>
>>Am I correct in assuming that the masculine ordinal indicator is measured in
>>inches ?
>
>
> By optimists, yes.
>
> For realists, cm.
>
> Pessimists, mm.
>
Typists, points?

From: Steve Rindsberg on
In article <us7QHRy2KHA.2284(a)TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl>, Bob I wrote:
> Steve Rindsberg wrote:
>
> > In article <48308446-E40B-4C79-80B2-2023163CCD10(a)microsoft.com>, BillyBob
> > wrote:
> >
> >>Am I correct in assuming that the masculine ordinal indicator is measured in
> >>inches ?
> >
> >
> > By optimists, yes.
> >
> > For realists, cm.
> >
> > Pessimists, mm.
> >
> Typists, points?

Or art directors. Yep.