Delcam For SolidWorks
in [SolidWorks]
|
From: Joe788 on 11 Nov 2009 18:35 On Nov 11, 3:29 pm, Sick of Jon Banquer <tar...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Nov 11, 6:20 am, Cliff <Clhuprichguessw...(a)aoltmovetheperiodc.om> > wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 08:21:35 -0800 (PST), Sick of Jon Banquer <tar...(a)gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > >On Nov 10, 7:30 am, Cliff <Clhuprichguessw...(a)aoltmovetheperiodc.om> > > >wrote: > > >> On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 03:54:09 -0800 (PST), Joe788 <larryro...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > >> >1. Despite the FACT that SolidWorks is a Corolla it's far better than > > >> >the CAD and graphics you get in stand-alone Mastercam, Surfcam or > > >> >bottom of the barrel Gibbscam so moving a CAM application into very > > >> >popular CAD program like SolidWorks is a huge step up from a stand- > > >> >alone solution like Mastercam, Gibbscam, Surfcam,etc. > > > >> >2. You can use a program like Solid Edge with ST2 or SpaceClaim to get > > >> >around the problems with modifying "dumb solids" in SolidWorks. > > > >> Gee .... "stand alone" programs .... > > >> LOL .... > > > >> If you don't want dumb solids then don't make them. > > >> If you got the data from someplace else just import it into your > > >> CAM program directly. > > >> You are not & never will be a designer, much less an engineer. > > > >> How dumb can a banquer get? IS there any limit? > > >> -- > > >> Cliff > > > >Did you know that Jon Banquer uses a stolen laptop and a stolen money > > >to fund his ideas. He stole my Dell laptop to create his blog and my > > >insurance money to pay for his move to California. > > > The move to CA or the prior one to AZ? > > > >How did he cash it > > >he used a bogus Power of Attorney. He has charges of defrauding the > > >state of Connecticut. Forged documents in order to get MASTERCAM > > >software. Trust in him and you will find your self robbed or in > > >prison. > > > >Don't be stupid. > > > -- > > Cliff > > He stole the check from me when I lived in Arizona. That's how he > funded his move to California. Who are you?
From: Sick of Jon Banquer on 11 Nov 2009 18:43 On Nov 11, 6:35 pm, Joe788 <joemama...(a)aol.com> wrote: > On Nov 11, 3:29 pm, Sick of Jon Banquer <tar...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Nov 11, 6:20 am, Cliff <Clhuprichguessw...(a)aoltmovetheperiodc.om> > > wrote: > > > > On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 08:21:35 -0800 (PST), Sick of Jon Banquer <tar...(a)gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > >On Nov 10, 7:30 am, Cliff <Clhuprichguessw...(a)aoltmovetheperiodc.om> > > > >wrote: > > > >> On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 03:54:09 -0800 (PST), Joe788 <larryro...(a)yahoo..com> wrote: > > > >> >1. Despite the FACT that SolidWorks is a Corolla it's far better than > > > >> >the CAD and graphics you get in stand-alone Mastercam, Surfcam or > > > >> >bottom of the barrel Gibbscam so moving a CAM application into very > > > >> >popular CAD program like SolidWorks is a huge step up from a stand- > > > >> >alone solution like Mastercam, Gibbscam, Surfcam,etc. > > > > >> >2. You can use a program like Solid Edge with ST2 or SpaceClaim to get > > > >> >around the problems with modifying "dumb solids" in SolidWorks. > > > > >> Gee .... "stand alone" programs .... > > > >> LOL .... > > > > >> If you don't want dumb solids then don't make them. > > > >> If you got the data from someplace else just import it into your > > > >> CAM program directly. > > > >> You are not & never will be a designer, much less an engineer. > > > > >> How dumb can a banquer get? IS there any limit? > > > >> -- > > > >> Cliff > > > > >Did you know that Jon Banquer uses a stolen laptop and a stolen money > > > >to fund his ideas. He stole my Dell laptop to create his blog and my > > > >insurance money to pay for his move to California. > > > > The move to CA or the prior one to AZ? > > > > >How did he cash it > > > >he used a bogus Power of Attorney. He has charges of defrauding the > > > >state of Connecticut. Forged documents in order to get MASTERCAM > > > >software. Trust in him and you will find your self robbed or in > > > >prison. > > > > >Don't be stupid. > > > > -- > > > Cliff > > > He stole the check from me when I lived in Arizona. That's how he > > funded his move to California. > > Who are you? Ask him. He knows who I am.
From: Cliff on 11 Nov 2009 19:06 On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 06:31:40 -0800 (PST), Joe788 <larryrozer(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >Right out of the gate Delcam For SolidWorks is going to have serious >functionality for 2 1/2 axis through 5 axis mill. Did you not claim it would not have 2 1/2 axes? -- Cliff
From: Cliff on 11 Nov 2009 19:29 On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 15:29:17 -0800 (PST), Sick of Jon Banquer <tarrrz(a)gmail.com> wrote: >He stole the check from me when I lived in Arizona. That's how he >funded his move to California. Why did he have to get out of Arizona? -- Cliff
From: Joe788 on 12 Nov 2009 01:49
On Nov 12, 6:00 am, BillT <kin...(a)mail.com> wrote: > He has single handedly > killed off any chance of discussing programming in a civilized fashion > here. Wrong, again. Your pal Cliffy Huprich is solely responsible for that. Sorry to have to yet again bring you back to reality. > I've questioned his negative life condition to him. He says he's good > with it As Tom Brewer's real dad use to say: Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight. You wish to change my interests and outlook yet you're constantly getting laid off / fired because you can't come to terms with what manufacturing has become. Further, you actually think that NX is going to grow without some major changes in marketing by Siemens. That would be the same horrible marketing you won't ever acknowledge. It's so bad and has been so bad for so long that Siemens VAR's make fun of those that work for Siemens because they are so out of touch with reality and the market. If you purchase NX you actually would get better service from a Siemens VAR than Siemens themselves. That's a fact. I know it and you know it. If you don't know it, you should now it. Regardless, as per usual you won't admit it. Further, you can't see that history based modeling is a dead end. The best that's going to happen is lots of companies will try and mix the two approaches (history and direct modeling) which is just a band-aid till the next generation of direct modelers rolls out. It's probably a good thing that you say you're getting out of the business because you won't be able to handle what's coming down. The Jon Banquer blog has started to lay it out and will continue to lay it out. The next phase is the death of stand-alone CAM like Gibbscam, Surfcam, Featurecam, Mastercam, etc as more shops realize that their old stand-alone CAM systems just can't keep up. Any idea how buggy Mastercam X4 is? Think things will get better with Mastercam X5? This is like thinking that Gibbscam is going to gain or hold onto market share. It's not going to happen because as per usual you're wrong... companies are changing CADCAM systems and their doing it right now. A major San Diego shop just dumped Mastercam for Open Mind Hypermill and they had used Mastercam for many years. The big changes have just started. Unfortunately it's going to be SolidWorks that most shops go with but as fully integrated CADCAM proves to be the market you will see the rise of direct modeling and CAM running inside of direct modelers. There is a very good chance that it could be CoCreate that jumps to the forefront because PTC is the elephant in the room and they are making lots of the right moves with CoCreate. Keep reading the Jon Banquer blog. ;>) The Jon Banquer blog is your best source to follow these major changes as they come down. www.jonbanquer.wordpress.com |