DeleteFile shows as DeleteFileA
in [MFC]
|
From: Joseph M. Newcomer on 14 Apr 2010 11:28 I believe that means "to the implementation of the C/C++ runtime implementation", not "to the implementation of code written by programmers outside the compiler environment". So it is still bad style to use this technique in any user-written code; it is reserved for the implementors of the C/C++ runtimes. joe On Mon, 12 Apr 2010 13:21:46 -0400, "Pete Delgado" <Peter.Delgado(a)NoSpam.com> wrote: > >"David Ching" <dc(a)remove-this.dcsoft.com> wrote in message >news:%23MKaTb$1KHA.1036(a)TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... >> "Goran" <goran.pusic(a)gmail.com> wrote in message >> news:9891b928-3a77-4738-aedb-0a6671fd1656(a)11g2000yqr.googlegroups.com... >>> P.S. "m_"!? Puh-lease! Ok, I agree that it's interesting to prefix >>> class data members, but what's wrong with a simple "_", or "F" (for >>> "field", as Borland does)? >> >> A leading '_' is reserved for compiler extensions, I believe. > >The C++ standard reserves the use of names within the global namespace that >begin with an underscore to the implementation. This means that class >members may indeed begin with an underscore because they are contained >within the class namespace. > >-Pete > Joseph M. Newcomer [MVP] email: newcomer(a)flounder.com Web: http://www.flounder.com MVP Tips: http://www.flounder.com/mvp_tips.htm
From: Pete Delgado on 14 Apr 2010 15:00
"David Ching" <dc(a)remove-this.dcsoft.com> wrote in message news:ePjeoS12KHA.1452(a)TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... > These days it's not so easy to draw the line, with "projects" having all > manner of different technologies in them. For example, a project might > have C++/COM, C++/MFC, Javascript, etc. Perhaps it makes more sense to > say similar "modules" should have the same conventions. I could live with that wording! :-) -Pete |