From: John Hasler on 6 Jul 2010 19:30 Richard Hector writes: > My understanding is that most spam comes from compromised home > machines these days - so the person getting disrupted is some poor > sucker whose machine is compromised, not the actual offender. I wrote: > The machine is compromised because the sucker failed to secure it. > While the botnet operator is the actual criminal the owner of the > compromised machine is still negligent. Richard Hector writes: > Through ignorance, in most cases, I suspect. I doubt most of them are > aware of the consequences. That's what prevents it from rising to the level of gross or malicious negligence. -- John Hasler -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST(a)lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster(a)lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/871vbgp5r6.fsf(a)thumper.dhh.gt.org
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 Prev: Current solution for ia32 on amd64? Next: Need dependency bug workaround for pulseaudio. |