From: Albert on 8 May 2010 08:43 Let f(x) = (x ^ 2) * e ^ x . Find {x: f'(x) < 0} f'(x) = (x ^ 3) * e ^ x. Solve (x ^ 3) * e ^ x = 0 x = 0 f'(-1) = -e ^ -1 = -1 / e f'(1) = e Sign diagram indicates gradient is negative when x < 0. Now I graphed f(x) on my calculator; it's clear that the gradient is not always negative before zero. How do I determine this without a calculator? TIA.
From: karl on 8 May 2010 08:52 Albert schrieb: > Let f(x) = (x ^ 2) * e ^ x . Find {x: f'(x) < 0} > > f'(x) = (x ^ 3) * e ^ x. What is this, the derivative of f(x)? If you think this, read in your textbook about the product rule for differentiating functions. > Solve (x ^ 3) * e ^ x = 0 > x = 0 > f'(-1) = -e ^ -1 = -1 / e > f'(1) = e > Sign diagram indicates gradient is negative when x < 0. >
From: Albert on 8 May 2010 08:57 karl wrote: > Albert schrieb: > > f'(x) = (x ^ 3) * e ^ x. > > What is this, the derivative of f(x)? If you think this, read in your textbook about the product rule for > differentiating functions. Yes, that is such a poor mistake I made. f'(x) = xe^x(2 + x)
From: karl on 8 May 2010 09:00 Albert schrieb: > karl wrote: >> Albert schrieb: >>> f'(x) = (x ^ 3) * e ^ x. >> What is this, the derivative of f(x)? If you think this, read in your textbook about the product rule for >> differentiating functions. > > Yes, that is such a poor mistake I made. > > f'(x) = xe^x(2 + x) I said, read in your textbook about the product rule.
From: amzoti on 8 May 2010 11:05 On May 8, 5:57 am, Albert <albert.xtheunkno...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > karl wrote: > > Albert schrieb: > > > f'(x) = (x ^ 3) * e ^ x. > > > What is this, the derivative of f(x)? If you think this, read in your textbook about the product rule for > > differentiating functions. > > Yes, that is such a poor mistake I made. > > f'(x) = xe^x(2 + x) If I asked you to find the derivative of u*v, how would you respond? You can see it here: http://www.math.hmc.edu/calculus/tutorials/prodrule/
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 Prev: Borel sets of the extended real line Next: Did Archimedes could knew this? |