Discarded [was: Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof]
in [Logic]
|
Prev: Thus Spake Xy Borg
Next: "NO BOX CONTAINS THE BOX NUMBERS THAT DON'T CONTAIN THEIR OWN BOX NUMBER" ~ XEN
From: herbzet on 8 Jun 2010 23:02 |-|ercules wrote: > "Daryl McCullough" <stevendaryl3016(a)yahoo.com> wrote ... > > > Here's what's funny about USENET. In a regular classroom, > > you have one teacher and many students. In a typical USENET > > discussion, there are many teachers and just one student. > > You'd think that such a low student/teacher ratio would make > > for quick progress, but that doesn't turn out to be the case. > > Herc's ignorance can defeat any number of teachers, no matter > > how knowledgeable and patient. > > > > If one of the 'teachers' would just answer my questions instead > of putting their fingers in their ears and reading maths scripture > then maybe we could work together on a what Cantor's proofs entail. > > TRUE or FALSE > > 1/ no box of the box numbers not in their own boxes proves higher infinities > > 2/ all possible digit sequences are computable to all, as in an infinite amount of, finite lengths > > ANY form of EVASION and not ANSWERING the questions will be discarded. <PLONK> -- hz
From: Dingo on 8 Jun 2010 23:18 On Tue, 08 Jun 2010 23:02:07 -0400, herbzet <herbzet(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > >|-|ercules wrote: >> "Daryl McCullough" <stevendaryl3016(a)yahoo.com> wrote ... >> >> > Here's what's funny about USENET. In a regular classroom, >> > you have one teacher and many students. In a typical USENET >> > discussion, there are many teachers and just one student. >> > You'd think that such a low student/teacher ratio would make >> > for quick progress, but that doesn't turn out to be the case. >> > Herc's ignorance can defeat any number of teachers, no matter >> > how knowledgeable and patient. >> > >> >> If one of the 'teachers' would just answer my questions instead >> of putting their fingers in their ears and reading maths scripture >> then maybe we could work together on a what Cantor's proofs entail. >> >> TRUE or FALSE >> >> 1/ no box of the box numbers not in their own boxes proves higher infinities >> >> 2/ all possible digit sequences are computable to all, as in an infinite amount of, finite lengths >> >> ANY form of EVASION and not ANSWERING the questions will be discarded. > ><PLONK> I've plonked Herc / Graham Cooper permanently.
From: herbzet on 9 Jun 2010 00:01
Dingo wrote: > herbzet wrote: > >|-|ercules wrote: > >> "Daryl McCullough" <stevendaryl3016(a)yahoo.com> wrote ... > >> > >> > Here's what's funny about USENET. In a regular classroom, > >> > you have one teacher and many students. In a typical USENET > >> > discussion, there are many teachers and just one student. > >> > You'd think that such a low student/teacher ratio would make > >> > for quick progress, but that doesn't turn out to be the case. > >> > Herc's ignorance can defeat any number of teachers, no matter > >> > how knowledgeable and patient. > >> > > >> > >> If one of the 'teachers' would just answer my questions instead > >> of putting their fingers in their ears and reading maths scripture > >> then maybe we could work together on a what Cantor's proofs entail. > >> > >> TRUE or FALSE > >> > >> 1/ no box of the box numbers not in their own boxes proves higher infinities > >> > >> 2/ all possible digit sequences are computable to all, as in an infinite amount of, finite lengths > >> > >> ANY form of EVASION and not ANSWERING the questions will be discarded. > > > ><PLONK> > > I've plonked Herc / Graham Cooper permanently. And so the revolution began, And his name, wreathed forever after in glory, was Dingo. -- hz |