Discovering the 4th dimension at the Big Bang
in [Relativity]
|
Prev: NEW DRAFT "THEORIES REDUCING TO QUANTUM MECHANICS, QUANTUM ELECTRODYNAMICSDOESN'T"
Next: Circular orbit proves space curve round
From: BURT on 30 Jun 2010 15:24 On Jun 30, 12:14�pm, Desertphile <desertph...(a)invalid-address.net> wrote: > On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 10:29:26 -0700 (PDT), BURT > > > > > > <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > On Jun 30, 1:06 am, "tim.anderson" <timot...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > On Jun 30, 12:55 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > On Jun 29, 7:50 pm, raven1 <quoththera...(a)nevermore.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 19:33:04 -0700 (PDT), BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > >On Jun 29, 7:22 pm, raven1 <quoththera...(a)nevermore.com> wrote: > > > > > >> On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 18:39:39 -0700 (PDT), BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> > > > > > >> wrote: > > > > > > >> >On Jun 29, 6:00 pm, raven1 <quoththera...(a)nevermore.com> wrote: > > > > > >> >> On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 17:06:54 -0700 (PDT), Michael Young > > > > > > >> >> <youngms...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > >> >> >On Jun 29, 6:38 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > >> >> >> On Jun 29, 3:22 pm, Desertphile <desertph...(a)invalid-address.net> > > > > > >> >> >> wrote: > > > > > > >> >> >> > On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 12:30:01 -0700 (PDT), BURT > > > > > > >> >> >> > <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > >> >> >> > > Space was an aether hypersphere that began and is now forever > > > > > >> >> >> > > expanding. > > > > > > >> >> >> > Appear Mental. > > > > > > >> >> >> > --http://desertphile.org > > > > > >> >> >> > Desertphile's Desert Soliloquy. WARNING: view with plenty of water > > > > > >> >> >> > "Why aren't resurrections from the dead noteworthy?" -- Jim Rutz > > > > > > >> >> >> I am dealing in the principle of two time gravity. > > > > > > >> >> >> Mitch Raemsch > > > > > > >> >> >I see stars in the sky. Such stars are burning balls of gas. They blow > > > > > >> >> >up sometimes. But it takes years to get to earth. Our sun is a star > > > > > >> >> >too, and it will blow up. The earth is round. But the sun won't blow > > > > > >> >> >up yet. > > > > > > >> >> <nit-pick clarification> > > > > > > >> >> It will "blow up" as in "expand" , but it won't "blow up" as in > > > > > >> >> "explode". > > > > > > >> >> </nit-pick clarification> > > > > > > >> >Yea. But in the future it becomes a brown dwarf that eventually > > > > > >> >fizzles out with the rest of the universe. > > > > > > >> And? > > > > > >It dies. > > > > > > And your point is?- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > Science is a death cult on that account. Do you not see it? > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > Why do I get the feeling that I am watching a mutant version of the > > > Eliza program?- Hide quoted text - > > If all the stars are going to die then there is a universal death. > > I say god is going to renew the stars. > > Why would the gods do that? Aren't they clever enough to just make > them never run out of fussible gases? > > --http://desertphile.org > Desertphile's Desert Soliloquy. WARNING: view with plenty of water > "Why aren't resurrections from the dead noteworthy?" -- Jim Rutz- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - There is only one ReCreator. Mitch Raemsch
From: BURT on 30 Jun 2010 15:51 On Jun 29, 8:02�pm, Rusty Sites <SpameYou...(a)spamex.com> wrote: > On 6/29/2010 6:39 PM, BURT wrote: > > > > > > > On Jun 29, 6:00 pm, raven1<quoththera...(a)nevermore.com> �wrote: > >> On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 17:06:54 -0700 (PDT), Michael Young > > >> <youngms...(a)gmail.com> �wrote: > >>> On Jun 29, 6:38 pm, BURT<macromi...(a)yahoo.com> �wrote: > >>>> On Jun 29, 3:22 pm, Desertphile<desertph...(a)invalid-address.net> > >>>> wrote: > > >>>>> On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 12:30:01 -0700 (PDT), BURT > > >>>>> <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> �wrote: > >>>>>> Space was an aether hypersphere that began and is now forever > >>>>>> expanding. > > >>>>> Appear Mental. > > >>>>> --http://desertphile.org > >>>>> Desertphile's Desert Soliloquy. WARNING: view with plenty of water > >>>>> "Why aren't resurrections from the dead noteworthy?" -- Jim Rutz > > >>>> I am dealing in the principle of two time gravity. > > >>>> Mitch Raemsch > > >>> I see stars in the sky. Such stars are burning balls of gas. They blow > >>> up sometimes. But it takes years to get to earth. Our sun is a star > >>> too, and it will blow up. The earth is round. But the sun won't blow > >>> up yet. > > >> <nit-pick clarification> > > >> It will "blow up" as in "expand" , but it won't "blow up" as in > >> "explode". > > >> </nit-pick clarification>- Hide quoted text - > > >> - Show quoted text - > > > Yea. But in the future it becomes a brown dwarf that eventually > > fizzles out with the rest of the universe. > > Yeah, but we have an exciting red giant phase to look forward to first.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - It would engulf us. Mitch Raemsch
From: Desertphile on 30 Jun 2010 22:34 On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 12:24:27 -0700 (PDT), BURT <macromitch(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On Jun 30, 12:14�pm, Desertphile <desertph...(a)invalid-address.net> > wrote: > > On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 10:29:26 -0700 (PDT), BURT > > > > > > > > > > > > <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > On Jun 30, 1:06 am, "tim.anderson" <timot...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Jun 30, 12:55 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Jun 29, 7:50 pm, raven1 <quoththera...(a)nevermore.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 19:33:04 -0700 (PDT), BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > >On Jun 29, 7:22 pm, raven1 <quoththera...(a)nevermore.com> wrote: > > > > > > >> On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 18:39:39 -0700 (PDT), BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> > > > > > > >> wrote: > > > > > > > > >> >On Jun 29, 6:00 pm, raven1 <quoththera...(a)nevermore.com> wrote: > > > > > > >> >> On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 17:06:54 -0700 (PDT), Michael Young > > > > > > > > >> >> <youngms...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > >> >> >On Jun 29, 6:38 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > >> >> >> On Jun 29, 3:22 pm, Desertphile <desertph...(a)invalid-address.net> > > > > > > >> >> >> wrote: > > > > > > > > >> >> >> > On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 12:30:01 -0700 (PDT), BURT > > > > > > > > >> >> >> > <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > >> >> >> > > Space was an aether hypersphere that began and is now forever > > > > > > >> >> >> > > expanding. > > > > > > > > >> >> >> > Appear Mental. > > > > > > > > >> >> >> > --http://desertphile.org > > > > > > >> >> >> > Desertphile's Desert Soliloquy. WARNING: view with plenty of water > > > > > > >> >> >> > "Why aren't resurrections from the dead noteworthy?" -- Jim Rutz > > > > > > > > >> >> >> I am dealing in the principle of two time gravity. > > > > > > > > >> >> >> Mitch Raemsch > > > > > > > > >> >> >I see stars in the sky. Such stars are burning balls of gas. They blow > > > > > > >> >> >up sometimes. But it takes years to get to earth. Our sun is a star > > > > > > >> >> >too, and it will blow up. The earth is round. But the sun won't blow > > > > > > >> >> >up yet. > > > > > > > > >> >> <nit-pick clarification> > > > > > > > > >> >> It will "blow up" as in "expand" , but it won't "blow up" as in > > > > > > >> >> "explode". > > > > > > > > >> >> </nit-pick clarification> > > > > > > > > >> >Yea. But in the future it becomes a brown dwarf that eventually > > > > > > >> >fizzles out with the rest of the universe. > > > > > > > > >> And? > > > > > > >It dies. > > > > > > > > And your point is?- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > > Science is a death cult on that account. Do you not see it? > > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > > Why do I get the feeling that I am watching a mutant version of the > > > > Eliza program?- Hide quoted text - > > > If all the stars are going to die then there is a universal death. > > > I say god is going to renew the stars. > > > > Why would the gods do that? Aren't they clever enough to just make > > them never run out of fussible gases? > There is only one recreator. I recreated three times last night. -- http://desertphile.org Desertphile's Desert Soliloquy. WARNING: view with plenty of water "Why aren't resurrections from the dead noteworthy?" -- Jim Rutz
From: Klaus Hellnick on 1 Jul 2010 01:19 On 6/30/2010 3:06 AM, tim.anderson wrote: > On Jun 30, 12:55 pm, BURT<macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> On Jun 29, 7:50 pm, raven1<quoththera...(a)nevermore.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >>> On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 19:33:04 -0700 (PDT), BURT<macromi...(a)yahoo.com> >>> wrote: >> >>>> On Jun 29, 7:22 pm, raven1<quoththera...(a)nevermore.com> wrote: >>>>> On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 18:39:39 -0700 (PDT), BURT<macromi...(a)yahoo.com> >>>>> wrote: >> >>>>>> On Jun 29, 6:00 pm, raven1<quoththera...(a)nevermore.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 17:06:54 -0700 (PDT), Michael Young >> >>>>>>> <youngms...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> On Jun 29, 6:38 pm, BURT<macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Jun 29, 3:22 pm, Desertphile<desertph...(a)invalid-address.net> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 12:30:01 -0700 (PDT), BURT >> >>>>>>>>>> <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Space was an aether hypersphere that began and is now forever >>>>>>>>>>> expanding. >> >>>>>>>>>> Appear Mental. >> >>>>>>>>>> --http://desertphile.org >>>>>>>>>> Desertphile's Desert Soliloquy. WARNING: view with plenty of water >>>>>>>>>> "Why aren't resurrections from the dead noteworthy?" -- Jim Rutz >> >>>>>>>>> I am dealing in the principle of two time gravity. >> >>>>>>>>> Mitch Raemsch >> >>>>>>>> I see stars in the sky. Such stars are burning balls of gas. They blow >>>>>>>> up sometimes. But it takes years to get to earth. Our sun is a star >>>>>>>> too, and it will blow up. The earth is round. But the sun won't blow >>>>>>>> up yet. >> >>>>>>> <nit-pick clarification> >> >>>>>>> It will "blow up" as in "expand" , but it won't "blow up" as in >>>>>>> "explode". >> >>>>>>> </nit-pick clarification> >> >>>>>> Yea. But in the future it becomes a brown dwarf that eventually >>>>>> fizzles out with the rest of the universe. >> >>>>> And? >>>> It dies. >> >>> And your point is?- Hide quoted text - >> >>> - Show quoted text - >> >> Science is a death cult on that account. Do you not see it? >> >> Mitch Raemsch > > Why do I get the feeling that I am watching a mutant version of the > Eliza program? > How do you feel about mutant version of the Eliza program?
From: Malygris on 1 Jul 2010 02:49
BURT wrote: > On Jun 30, 12:14 pm, Desertphile <desertph...(a)invalid-address.net> > wrote: >> On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 10:29:26 -0700 (PDT), BURT >> >> >> >> >> >> <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> > On Jun 30, 1:06 am, "tim.anderson" <timot...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> > > On Jun 30, 12:55 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> >> > > > On Jun 29, 7:50 pm, raven1 <quoththera...(a)nevermore.com> wrote: >> >> > > > > On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 19:33:04 -0700 (PDT), BURT >> > > > > <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> >> > > > > >On Jun 29, 7:22 pm, raven1 <quoththera...(a)nevermore.com> wrote: >> > > > > >> On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 18:39:39 -0700 (PDT), BURT >> > > > > >> <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> >> > > > > >> >On Jun 29, 6:00 pm, raven1 <quoththera...(a)nevermore.com> >> > > > > >> >wrote: >> > > > > >> >> On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 17:06:54 -0700 (PDT), Michael Young >> >> > > > > >> >> <youngms...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> > > > > >> >> >On Jun 29, 6:38 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> > > > > >> >> >> On Jun 29, 3:22 pm, Desertphile >> > > > > >> >> >> <desertph...(a)invalid-address.net> wrote: >> >> > > > > >> >> >> > On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 12:30:01 -0700 (PDT), BURT >> >> > > > > >> >> >> > <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> > > > > >> >> >> > > Space was an aether hypersphere that began and is >> > > > > >> >> >> > > now forever expanding. >> >> > > > > >> >> >> > Appear Mental. >> >> > > > > >> >> >> > --http://desertphile.org >> > > > > >> >> >> > Desertphile's Desert Soliloquy. WARNING: view with >> > > > > >> >> >> > plenty of water "Why aren't resurrections from the >> > > > > >> >> >> > dead noteworthy?" -- Jim Rutz >> >> > > > > >> >> >> I am dealing in the principle of two time gravity. >> >> > > > > >> >> >> Mitch Raemsch >> >> > > > > >> >> >I see stars in the sky. Such stars are burning balls of >> > > > > >> >> >gas. They blow up sometimes. But it takes years to get to >> > > > > >> >> >earth. Our sun is a star too, and it will blow up. The >> > > > > >> >> >earth is round. But the sun won't blow up yet. >> >> > > > > >> >> <nit-pick clarification> >> >> > > > > >> >> It will "blow up" as in "expand" , but it won't "blow up" >> > > > > >> >> as in "explode". >> >> > > > > >> >> </nit-pick clarification> >> >> > > > > >> >Yea. But in the future it becomes a brown dwarf that >> > > > > >> >eventually fizzles out with the rest of the universe. >> >> > > > > >> And? >> > > > > >It dies. >> >> > > > > And your point is?- Hide quoted text - >> >> > > > > - Show quoted text - >> >> > > > Science is a death cult on that account. Do you not see it? >> >> > > > Mitch Raemsch >> >> > > Why do I get the feeling that I am watching a mutant version of the >> > > Eliza program?- Hide quoted text - >> > If all the stars are going to die then there is a universal death. >> > I say god is going to renew the stars. >> >> Why would the gods do that? Aren't they clever enough to just make >> them never run out of fussible gases? >> >> --http://desertphile.org >> Desertphile's Desert Soliloquy. WARNING: view with plenty of water >> "Why aren't resurrections from the dead noteworthy?" -- Jim Rutz- Hide >> quoted text - >> >> - Show quoted text - > > There is only one ReCreator. Herbert West ReCreator? -- Malygris |