Prev: Professor Ronald Federici: Euler's Paradox Solved?
Next: wo has read the work of Abel about the 5th equation?
From: Arturo Magidin on 26 May 2010 20:51
On May 26, 2:13 pm, honghanru <hongha...(a)googlemail.com> wrote:
> hello,
>
> wo has read this book ? and understand?

I've read the English translation. Most of it is pretty
straightforward (the proof of quadratic reciprocity is rather ugly
[someone once called it a proof by mathematical revulsion]) but
straightforward. The hardest section is the section on Forms.

Why?

--
Arturo Magidin
From: honghanru on 27 May 2010 15:42
On 5ÔÂ26ÈÕ, ÏÂÎç9ʱ13·Ö, honghanru <hongha...(a)googlemail.com> wrote:
> hello,
>
> wo has read this book ? and understand?

http://knol.google.com/k/fei-hong/257/2be0zrpe8zzd6/3
From: honghanru on 25 Jun 2010 04:28
On 5ÔÂ27ÈÕ, ÉÏÎç2ʱ06·Ö, Joubert <trappedinthecloset9...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> It's a really nice read. I read it in french, it's perfectly
> understandable.

hello Joubert,

i am glad to hear that. have you read the Artikel of Abel? his proof
about the 5.th equation?

i read it of german, i think it is not to understand. can you try to
read that in french?

i would be very glad to listen to your opinion about that.

with friendly

Fei
First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2
Prev: Professor Ronald Federici: Euler's Paradox Solved?
Next: wo has read the work of Abel about the 5th equation?