From: Friends on
Hey All,

I have a dataset named test the snapshot of which is included below.
I have to divide this table in to smaller tables in such a way that
the total length of the name field in a table does not exceed 50
characters

Obs name id len a

1 damodaranpilla 23 14 14
2 panickerettan 34 13 27
3 shivashankaran 32 14 41
4 karunakaranpilla 989 16 57
5 muralidharan 36 12 69
6 keshavannambiar 76 15 84
7 mohanlal 1 8 92
8 sreekumaranthampi 54 17 109
9 ravivarmathamburan 56 18 127
10 pishardy 88 8 135
11 velayudhan 344 10 145
12 aniyankutty 76 11 156
13 beeranikka 333 10 166
14 ahmedkutty 656 10 176
15 pappachan 647 9 185
16 chackochan 646 10 195
17 musiliyar 554 9 204

If you look at the above example,we need to sum up the length of
variable named "NAME" and if the sum is less than 50 make a separate
table out of it.For example in the above case the sum of length of
"NAME" for first three
observations comes out to be 41 and if we add the length of name for
the next observation that is the 4 th observation we exceed a length
boundary of 50.So we will make a table using the first 3
observation.Now in the second run if we add the length of "NAME" for
4,5,6 observation it comes out to be 43 now if we add the 7
observation the sum turns out to be 51 so the table should have only
observations 4,5,6.This process has to repeat till we reach the end of
the table.Hope you guys got the problem.

A further extension to this provlem would be that in addition to
considering only NAME variable there will other variable which need to
be considered like ZIP,PHONE NUMBER.



Sachin.
From: Richard A. DeVenezia on
On Mar 26, 3:34 am, Friends <sachin.s.n...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Hey All,
>
> I have a dataset named test the snapshot of which is included below.
> I have to divide this table in to smaller tables in such a way that
> the total length of the name field in a table does not exceed 50
> characters
>
>  Obs    name                   id       len     a
>
>    1    damodaranpilla         23     14     14
>    2    panickerettan           34     13     27
>    3    shivashankaran        32     14     41
>    4    karunakaranpilla      989     16     57
>    5    muralidharan             36     12     69
>    6    keshavannambiar       76     15     84
>    7    mohanlal                     1      8     92
>    8    sreekumaranthampi   54     17    109
>    9    ravivarmathamburan    56     18    127
>   10    pishardy                   88      8    135
>   11    velayudhan             344     10    145
>   12    aniyankutty              76     11    156
>   13    beeranikka             333     10    166
>   14    ahmedkutty            656     10    176
>   15    pappachan             647      9    185
>   16    chackochan           646     10    195
>   17    musiliyar                554      9    204
>
> If you look at the above example,we need to sum up the length of
> variable named "NAME" and if the sum is less than 50 make a separate
> table out of it.For example in the above case the sum of length of
> "NAME" for first three
> observations comes out to be 41 and if we add the length of name for
> the next observation that is the 4 th observation we exceed a length
> boundary of 50.So we will make a table using the first 3
> observation.Now in the second run if we add the length of "NAME" for
> 4,5,6 observation it comes out to be 43 now if we add the 7
> observation the sum turns out to be 51 so the table should have only
> observations 4,5,6.This process has to repeat till we reach the end of
> the table.Hope you guys got the problem.
>
> A further extension to this provlem would be that in addition to
> considering only NAME variable there will other variable which need to
> be considered like ZIP,PHONE NUMBER.
>
> Sachin.

Certainly possible, but highly discouraged.

Dynamic splitting is often performed using HASH object OUTPUT method.

One row look ahead of a variable is sometimes accomplished using MERGE
without a BY.
MERGE have have(firstosb=2 keep=X rename=(X=nextX));

Q: In what analytic or organizational scheme would such a breaking up
scheme make sense ?
Q: What are the output table names supposed to be ?

If it's homework, your professor is a nitwit.
--
Richard A. DeVenezia
http://www.devenezia.com