Prev: Photos about Botany
Next: Large capacity storage
From: Rich on 9 Nov 2009 13:32 LCD's are dinosaurs. They've been around for over 30 years. Isn't it time they started working on a better technology (flexible, portable, less fragile?) to promote the replacement of books with? For God's sakes, computer screens aren't even vertical, they're still mostly horizontally oriented and books (in 99% of the cases) are not. http://www.cnn.com/2009/TECH/11/09/apple.tablet.jobs/index.html
From: U*U on 9 Nov 2009 14:14 Books are even old dinosaurs, who say's they are right. Afterall they've been around for 2,000 years. "Rich" <rander3127(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:06d5acac-2b35-476c-b5bf-1028fe4b9c3b(a)p8g2000yqb.googlegroups.com... > LCD's are dinosaurs. They've been around for over 30 years. Isn't it > time they started working on a better technology (flexible, portable, > less fragile?) to promote the replacement of books with? For God's > sakes, computer screens aren't even vertical, they're still mostly > horizontally oriented and books (in 99% of the cases) are not. > > http://www.cnn.com/2009/TECH/11/09/apple.tablet.jobs/index.html
From: Savageduck on 9 Nov 2009 14:57 On 2009-11-09 10:32:43 -0800, Rich <rander3127(a)gmail.com> said: > LCD's are dinosaurs. They've been around for over 30 years. Isn't it > time they started working on a better technology (flexible, portable, > less fragile?) to promote the replacement of books with? For God's > sakes, computer screens aren't even vertical, they're still mostly > horizontally oriented and books (in 99% of the cases) are not. > > http://www.cnn.com/2009/TECH/11/09/apple.tablet.jobs/index.html ....and all this is about, is CNN speculation on Steve Job's brain. -- Regards, Savageduck
From: J�rgen Exner on 9 Nov 2009 19:23 Rich <rander3127(a)gmail.com> wrote: >LCD's are dinosaurs. They've been around for over 30 years. Isn't it >time they started working on a better technology (flexible, portable, >less fragile?) to promote the replacement of books with? For God's >sakes, computer screens aren't even vertical, they're still mostly >horizontally oriented and books (in 99% of the cases) are not. ???? Almost all computer screen I've seen in the past 30 years are vertical or near vertical (often at a 10-20 degree angle). Horizontal screens are common only in tablet PCs and in special appliations, e.g. a monitor built into a table. And that's quite logical if you think about it. After all you have to bend over to see a horizontal screen which in general is much less ergonomic than looking straight ahead at a vertical or almost vertical screen. Not to mention that I certainly don't want a horizontal screen take up valueable space on my desk. jue
From: Nervous Nick on 9 Nov 2009 20:09
On Nov 9, 6:23 pm, Jürgen Exner <jurge...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > Rich <rander3...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >LCD's are dinosaurs. They've been around for over 30 years. Isn't it > >time they started working on a better technology (flexible, portable, > >less fragile?) to promote the replacement of books with? For God's > >sakes, computer screens aren't even vertical, they're still mostly > >horizontally oriented and books (in 99% of the cases) are not. > > ???? > Almost all computer screen I've seen in the past 30 years are vertical > or near vertical (often at a 10-20 degree angle). Horizontal screens are > common only in tablet PCs and in special appliations, e.g. a monitor > built into a table. > And that's quite logical if you think about it. After all you have to > bend over to see a horizontal screen which in general is much less > ergonomic than looking straight ahead at a vertical or almost vertical > screen. You stole the reply that I was too embarrassed to post. Nice one. -- YOP... |