From: Graham Cooper on 20 May 2010 22:14 On May 21, 12:08 pm, BDK <TopSh...(a)sanity.com> wrote: > > I was going to leave it in your capable hands Coach, but since you > > informed your people in the know they've INCREASED the sonic torture > > to 36 hours a day! > > > Herc > > Thirty six hours. Neat trick. > > I applaud their hard work! > > Are they going to be selling time machines, too? > OMG I've never seen such an inane explanation of a joke since Bicentennial Man explained the 4 reason why a chicken might want to cross the road. 1/ There could be food on the other side 2/ There may be a predator behind him 3/ There could be a potential mate on the other side 4/ .....homework for BDK... might be dodging an oncoming car can't remember Herc
From: Graham Cooper on 20 May 2010 22:36 On May 21, 12:31 pm, BDK <TopSh...(a)sanity.com> wrote: > Woosh... That woosh was pathetic. Herc
From: Sylvia Else on 20 May 2010 23:37 On 21/05/2010 3:08 AM, Graham Cooper wrote: > On May 20, 9:42 pm, "Jesse F. Hughes"<je...(a)phiwumbda.org> wrote: >> Sylvia Else<syl...(a)not.at.this.address> writes: >>> I'm pretty sure they use a hi-tech spam filter (much better than >>> anything the public are allowed to have) to deal with emails such as >>> yours. >> >> The government doesn't allow the public to have good spam filters? >> > > > You would either know such a fact or you wouldn't, it's not something > you could be "pretty sure" of. Sylvia has degenerated into my troll. > She posted that her entire motive of having discussions with me was to > lure me to get aggravated and demean her. No, that's not what I said. The purpose was to test your claim that you don't insult me unless I claim that you're mentally ill or that you committed extortion. The test showed that your claim was false. But everything I said in that discussion was the truth as I saw it. > Now it appears she's having > another go. > > Funny the logical computer Silver Else is faltering though, now she > only seems "pretty sure" I'm not really ADAM. Seems her deductions > processes based on Occam's Razor are under review and the old cow is > realizing something is amiss! Being pretty sure about one thing doesn't mean I'm only pretty sure about another. Sylvia.
From: george on 21 May 2010 01:05 On May 21, 2:03 pm, Coach <suv...(a)yahoo.fr> wrote: > On May 21, 10:33 am, george <gbl...(a)hnpl.net> wrote: > > > On May 21, 11:25 am, Graham Cooper <grahamcoop...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > I was going to leave it in your capable hands Coach, but since you > > > informed your people in the know they've INCREASED the sonic torture > > > to 36 hours a day! > > > Just when you think he can't get any sillier he does. > > Is there no beginning to his abilities ? > > Is there "no beginning to his abilities"? I surely hope that > sentence made some sense to you. Since his abilities are non-existent there is no beginning to them.
From: Herc7 on 21 May 2010 01:27 On May 21, 1:37 pm, Sylvia Else <syl...(a)not.at.this.address> wrote: > On 21/05/2010 3:08 AM, Graham Cooper wrote: > > > On May 20, 9:42 pm, "Jesse F. Hughes"<je...(a)phiwumbda.org> wrote: > >> Sylvia Else<syl...(a)not.at.this.address> writes: > >>> I'm pretty sure they use a hi-tech spam filter (much better than > >>> anything the public are allowed to have) to deal with emails such as > >>> yours. > > >> The government doesn't allow the public to have good spam filters? > > > You would either know such a fact or you wouldn't, it's not something > > you could be "pretty sure" of. Sylvia has degenerated into my troll. > > She posted that her entire motive of having discussions with me was to > > lure me to get aggravated and demean her. > > No, that's not what I said. The purpose was to test your claim that you > don't insult me unless I claim that you're mentally ill or that you > committed extortion. The test showed that your claim was false. But > everything I said in that discussion was the truth as I saw it. > > > Now it appears she's having > > another go. > > > Funny the logical computer Silver Else is faltering though, now she > > only seems "pretty sure" I'm not really ADAM. Seems her deductions > > processes based on Occam's Razor are under review and the old cow is > > realizing something is amiss! > > Being pretty sure about one thing doesn't mean I'm only pretty sure > about another. > > Sylvia. It's what was on your mind. Good to see you were telling the truth I thought you were trying to bait me! Herc
First
|
Prev
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 Prev: AffineSymmetricGroup Next: Euler's Rotation Theorem Proof |