Do you suggest me using IDE when I'm learning JAVA
in [Java Help]
|
Prev: call jni function dynamically without getting a JNIEnv handleas an argument.
Next: Encoding issue on my jsp page
From: Martin Gregorie on 3 May 2010 09:24 On Sun, 02 May 2010 22:44:14 -0700, BGB / cr88192 wrote: >> What does GIMP have to do with Java? >> >> > well, it can edit images, and images are often used in apps, but > photo-editing is typically not supported by IDE's... > Personally, I find xfig to be much more useful than GIMP for drawing icons, etc. because it is an Xterm vector graphics editor with the ability to export JPG or PNG images. This despite its highly nonstandard UI. However, ymmv. -- martin@ | Martin Gregorie gregorie. | Essex, UK org |
From: Arved Sandstrom on 3 May 2010 10:00 Lew wrote: > Arved Sandstrom wrote: >> My most frequent use of emacs is when I forget to supply a comment when >> doing a command line Subversion commit; my EDITOR on my UNIXes is emacs, > > You know you can change that, right? > Oh yeah, but why bother? It helps remind me that emacs exists. :-) AHS
From: cr88192 on 3 May 2010 10:46 "Martin Gregorie" <martin(a)address-in-sig.invalid> wrote in message news:hrmir8$n7q$3(a)localhost.localdomain... > On Sun, 02 May 2010 22:44:14 -0700, BGB / cr88192 wrote: > >>> What does GIMP have to do with Java? >>> >>> >> well, it can edit images, and images are often used in apps, but >> photo-editing is typically not supported by IDE's... >> > Personally, I find xfig to be much more useful than GIMP for drawing > icons, etc. because it is an Xterm vector graphics editor with the > ability to export JPG or PNG images. This despite its highly nonstandard > UI. However, ymmv. > GIMP is often regularly used on Windows though, whereas xfig is not (although AFAIK it comes with Cygwin along with its special X server...).
From: cr88192 on 3 May 2010 10:50 "Martin Gregorie" <martin(a)address-in-sig.invalid> wrote in message news:hrmhn1$n7q$1(a)localhost.localdomain... > On Sun, 02 May 2010 19:42:11 -0700, BGB / cr88192 wrote: > >> this would seem to be all of them, and I suspect CR is falling into >> oblivion (since OSX switched to LF...). >> > I didn't know that OSX used CR. Presumably that was for OS9 and earlier? > Since OSX is based on BSD I's jus assumed it would use LF. > it does... I think you misread what I wrote... OSX does use LF (but OS9 and earlier were CR). > The only place I've seen CR linefeeds at all recently was in Microware's > OS-9 OS - which, by coincidence runs on MC6809 and MC68xxx hardware. > > Speaking of MC6809 kit, I don't remember what TSC's Flex-09 used despite > owning a still-functional system. Possibly that was CR as well. > ok.
From: Martin Gregorie on 3 May 2010 12:41
On Mon, 03 May 2010 07:50:28 -0700, cr88192 wrote: >>> this would seem to be all of them, and I suspect CR is falling into >>> oblivion (since OSX switched to LF...). >>> > I think you misread what I wrote... > Yup. Since I've never seen "OSX" used to refer to OS9 and its ancestors I took the above to mean that early OS X versions used CR before changing to LF in midstream. -- martin@ | Martin Gregorie gregorie. | Essex, UK org | |