From: owl on 6 Apr 2010 18:17 In comp.os.linux.advocacy RayLopez99 <raylopez88(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Apr 6, 10:37�pm, owl <o...(a)rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> In comp.os.linux.advocacy RayLopez99 <raylope...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> Can you define "complex"? >> >> > Easy. �Complex is a feature that your opponent in a negotiation has in >> > their word processing document, that you cannot reproduce because you >> > are using OO rather than Word. >> >> > Got it? �And that means you lose the negotiation, lose the sale, lose >> > the job, lose your job. >> >> Could you outline a scenario where lack of a document feature would >> cause loss of a negotiation, sale, or job? > > Easy. But you're smart enough to do that owl. > > I've been involved in multibillion dollar negotiations, teetering on a > knife edge (buyer/seller last minute remorse), where having the wrong > font (offensive to the other side) was almost the straw that broke the > camel's back. If you read Barbarians at the Gate there's a scene in > there about how a certain aroma of tobacco smoke in a smoke filled > room was deemed offensive. Imagine now sending a file in OO rather > than Office that breaks. Hell, that's cause for terminating a > negotiation even in the best of times, much less when people are on > the edge of their seat. > Sounds like people who don't want to do business with each other to me.
|
Pages: 1 Prev: How to do "Mailto:" when email address includes an ampersand? Next: Office 2003 and Windows 7 |