Documents of Project DoD Federici DMCA Takedown lawsuit now available [Math]

Prev: Exactly why the theories of relativity are complete nonsense - the basic mistake exposed!
Next: Anti-Einsteiniana: Natural Philosophy Alliance?

From: Monica Pignotti on 3 Jan 2010 18:34

On Dec 15 2009, 8:11 pm, didacticderivative
<didacticderivat...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> United States Court, District of Maine. Case 2:09-cv-00213-DBH
>
> Project DoD, hosting company of the likes of Larry Sarner (voting
> machine scam artrist), Linda Rosa (she who followed Sarner into
> bankruptcy) and Jean Mercer (the psychologist who never treated a
> patient) lost their "landmark reverse DMCA" case.
>
> What are they going to do now, invent the iPigno, a device that
> refuses to read the works of Charles Sanders Peirce, Claude Levi-
> Strauss, and Stanislaw Lem?
>
> Attorneys Rufus Brown, Robert Mittel, and Tiffany Rad are
> reconsidering the wisdom of believing everything Christopher Mooney
> tells them

For people who are actually interested in the facts of this case, the
documents are all available here. This should be of interest to people
on ARS, as it involves freedom of speech on the internet and details
harassment that has occurred. The case was only dismissed due to an
issue of jurisdiction, not because DoD was wrong. Documents can be
downloaded people can read about the facts of this case at:

https://chris.dod.net/?p=387

So yes, this particular battle has been lost but at least attention
has been brought to this important issue and the war for free speech
on the internet is far from over, rest assured.

From: Gregory Hall on 3 Jan 2010 18:52

"Monica Pignotti" <pignotti(a)worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:5d4182d3-30d0-4b31-b329-92fbe0c6110e(a)e27g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...
On Dec 15 2009, 8:11 pm, didacticderivative
<didacticderivat...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> United States Court, District of Maine. Case 2:09-cv-00213-DBH
>
> Project DoD, hosting company of the likes of Larry Sarner (voting
> machine scam artrist), Linda Rosa (she who followed Sarner into
> bankruptcy) and Jean Mercer (the psychologist who never treated a
> patient) lost their "landmark reverse DMCA" case.
>
> What are they going to do now, invent the iPigno, a device that
> refuses to read the works of Charles Sanders Peirce, Claude Levi-
> Strauss, and Stanislaw Lem?
>
> Attorneys Rufus Brown, Robert Mittel, and Tiffany Rad are
> reconsidering the wisdom of believing everything Christopher Mooney
> tells them�

For people who are actually interested in the facts of this case, the
documents are all available here. This should be of interest to people
on ARS, as it involves freedom of speech on the internet and details
harassment that has occurred. The case was only dismissed due to an
issue of jurisdiction, not because DoD was wrong. Documents can be
downloaded people can read about the facts of this case at:

https://chris.dod.net/?p=387

So yes, this particular battle has been lost but at least attention
has been brought to this important issue and the war for free speech
on the internet is far from over, rest assured.

================================

[REPLY]

You're a proven censorship advocate, Monica. You actively engage in
censorship. Stop being such a hypocrite.

--
Gregory Hall

From: Rev. Richard Skull on 3 Jan 2010 19:05

On Jan 3, 6:52 pm, "Gregory Hall" <gregh...(a)home.fake> wrote:
> "Monica Pignotti" <pigno...(a)worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
>
> news:5d4182d3-30d0-4b31-b329-92fbe0c6110e(a)e27g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...
> On Dec 15 2009, 8:11 pm, didacticderivative
>
> <didacticderivat...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> > United States Court, District of Maine. Case 2:09-cv-00213-DBH
>
> > Project DoD, hosting company of the likes of Larry Sarner (voting
> > machine scam artrist), Linda Rosa (she who followed Sarner into
> > bankruptcy) and Jean Mercer (the psychologist who never treated a
> > patient) lost their "landmark reverse DMCA" case.
>
> > What are they going to do now, invent the iPigno, a device that
> > refuses to read the works of Charles Sanders Peirce, Claude Levi-
> > Strauss, and Stanislaw Lem?
>
> > Attorneys Rufus Brown, Robert Mittel, and Tiffany Rad are
> > reconsidering the wisdom of believing everything Christopher Mooney
> > tells them
>
> For people who are actually interested in the facts of this case, the
> documents are all available here. This should be of interest to people
> on ARS, as it involves freedom of speech on the internet and details
> harassment that has occurred. The case was only dismissed due to an
> issue of jurisdiction, not because DoD was wrong. Documents can be
> downloaded people can read about the facts of this case at:
>
> https://chris.dod.net/?p=387
>
> So yes, this particular battle has been lost but at least attention
> has been brought to this important issue and the war for free speech
> on the internet is far from over, rest assured.
>
> ================================
>
> [REPLY]
>
> You're a proven censorship advocate, Monica. You actively engage in
> censorship. Stop being such a hypocrite.
>
> --
> Gregory Hall

they hired Edna Flan to appeal the ruling. She's in tight with all the
Supreme Court Justices except Sotomayer

From: Monica Pignotti on 3 Jan 2010 19:46

From: Monica Pignotti on 3 Jan 2010 19:48

On Jan 3, 6:52 pm, "Gregory Hall" <gregh...(a)home.fake> wrote:
> "Monica Pignotti" <pigno...(a)worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
>
> news:5d4182d3-30d0-4b31-b329-92fbe0c6110e(a)e27g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...
> On Dec 15 2009, 8:11 pm, didacticderivative
>
> <didacticderivat...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> > United States Court, District of Maine. Case 2:09-cv-00213-DBH
>
> > Project DoD, hosting company of the likes of Larry Sarner (voting
> > machine scam artrist), Linda Rosa (she who followed Sarner into
> > bankruptcy) and Jean Mercer (the psychologist who never treated a
> > patient) lost their "landmark reverse DMCA" case.
>
> > What are they going to do now, invent the iPigno, a device that
> > refuses to read the works of Charles Sanders Peirce, Claude Levi-
> > Strauss, and Stanislaw Lem?
>
> > Attorneys Rufus Brown, Robert Mittel, and Tiffany Rad are
> > reconsidering the wisdom of believing everything Christopher Mooney
> > tells them
>
> For people who are actually interested in the facts of this case, the
> documents are all available here. This should be of interest to people
> on ARS, as it involves freedom of speech on the internet and details
> harassment that has occurred. The case was only dismissed due to an
> issue of jurisdiction, not because DoD was wrong. Documents can be
> downloaded people can read about the facts of this case at:
>
> https://chris.dod.net/?p=387
>
> So yes, this particular battle has been lost but at least attention
> has been brought to this important issue and the war for free speech
> on the internet is far from over, rest assured.
>
> ================================
>
> [REPLY]
>
> You're a proven censorship advocate, Monica. You actively engage in
> censorship. Stop being such a hypocrite.
>
> --
> Gregory Hall

Wrong. My protesting your abusive misappropriation of my image by
requesting a private website to remove it is not "censorship". I did
not misuse or even evoke DMCA. It is not the same thing at all. The
private website made the decision to remove your abuse of my image,
something they had every right to do. It is not the same thing at all.
Free speech does not include a right to abuse and harass, as you seem
to think it does.

| Next | Last
Pages: 1 2
Prev: Exactly why the theories of relativity are complete nonsense - the basic mistake exposed!
Next: Anti-Einsteiniana: Natural Philosophy Alliance?