From: MooseFET on
I have an application where I need 3 DACs controlled by a micro.

Right now I have a quad DAC chip external to the processor. If
a small processor had 3 or more DACs, it could save me a bit of
space and signal connections.

16 bitters preferred but 12 bit may work.

I can't use PWM stuff because I need frequency response and
low noise at the same time.
From: krw on
On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 17:43:22 -0700 (PDT), MooseFET <kensmith(a)rahul.net> wrote:

>I have an application where I need 3 DACs controlled by a micro.
>
>Right now I have a quad DAC chip external to the processor. If
>a small processor had 3 or more DACs, it could save me a bit of
>space and signal connections.
>
>16 bitters preferred but 12 bit may work.
>
>I can't use PWM stuff because I need frequency response and
>low noise at the same time.

I've not seen any DACs on logic devices that are worth a damn. For some
reason they can make ADCs but not DACs. Sixteen bits really is pushing it.
From: Sjouke Burry on
MooseFET wrote:
> I have an application where I need 3 DACs controlled by a micro.
>
> Right now I have a quad DAC chip external to the processor. If
> a small processor had 3 or more DACs, it could save me a bit of
> space and signal connections.
>
> 16 bitters preferred but 12 bit may work.
>
> I can't use PWM stuff because I need frequency response and
> low noise at the same time.

connect 3 or more sample/hold amplifiers to one dac.
From: Tim Wescott on
krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 17:43:22 -0700 (PDT), MooseFET <kensmith(a)rahul.net> wrote:
>
>> I have an application where I need 3 DACs controlled by a micro.
>>
>> Right now I have a quad DAC chip external to the processor. If
>> a small processor had 3 or more DACs, it could save me a bit of
>> space and signal connections.
>>
>> 16 bitters preferred but 12 bit may work.
>>
>> I can't use PWM stuff because I need frequency response and
>> low noise at the same time.
>
> I've not seen any DACs on logic devices that are worth a damn. For some
> reason they can make ADCs but not DACs. Sixteen bits really is pushing it.

I know that the 68HC11F (old part) had C/2C ladders instead of R/2R -- I
wonder if that's the case for all of them, and the resistors just can't
be done?

Seems like you could make a dynamic DAC, put a C/2C ladder into a sample
& hold, and keep updating it -- but I dunno.

--
Tim Wescott
Control system and signal processing consulting
www.wescottdesign.com
From: Uwe Hercksen on


Sjouke Burry schrieb:
>
> connect 3 or more sample/hold amplifiers to one dac.

Hello,

this would waste PCB space in comparison with the alternative of using a
quad DAC in a small package.

Bye

 |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2
Prev: Update
Next: HS gate drive transformer?