From: FatAnt on 30 Jul 2010 10:33 Tom wrote: > I have no problem with using LiveUpgrade (This would prevent significant > downtime I agree, with LiveUpgrade you are some options but with this procedure you use "wrapper commands" for patchnig and sometime you may have bad surprises. LiveUpgrade was always good to upgrade the operating system and I never had problems but I happened to have trouble for ABE patching (Alternate Boot Environment). Despite the command options were correct and also the paths were correct: # luupgrade -t -n "ABE_NAME" -s FULL_PATH/patches -O "-M FULL_PATH/patches patch_order" I happened that instead to patch the ABE (mounted on /a) has been patched the current boot environment?!?! ...and the output of the procedure did not indicate any error! Unfortunately I could not replicate the problem in the laboratory to try to fix or to open an alert. Certainly it was my mistake (I hope) but I never understood what error...and this thing has me terrified!!!! In short if I'm not forced to use LiveUpgrade (for cluster patching) I prefer to use other alternatives for highly sensitive operations such as this. > I have a problem with, but the lack of information from Oracle/Sun on the Best > Practice procedure for using LiveUpgrade with HA-Zones, or a warning > to not use LiveUpgrade with HA-Zones. yes, Sun-Oracle's documentation is often messy and contradictory :-( Someone should create a website where all of us can send the complete procedures performed. A repository where they are listed: versions, commands, options, execution order, hardware and full output. Description from initial situation to final situation. > By the way, your English is very good. thanks for the nice lie (and thanks google.translate) ;-) ....maybe now you've changed your opinion heheh
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 3 Prev: About Apache2 with RBAC Next: How can I find out if CPU throttling is enabled? |