Does inductive reasoning lead to knowledge?
in [Physics]
|
Prev: Do waves move faster in a liquid with a higher density?
Next: ...100 MW of Space Solar Power ...per single launch!
From: jmfbahciv on 12 Jan 2010 08:21 John Stafford wrote: > In article <doraymeRidThis-F346EA.07284412012010(a)news.albasani.net>, > dorayme <doraymeRidThis(a)optusnet.com.au> wrote: > >> If you do not believe this, check the history of almost every thread I >> have been on. But, having experienced your weasel ways here, your >> unforthcomingness when the topic discussion gets pressing, you will not >> be able to see this even if you looked. You will skew all the stats and >> take unrepresentative cases for the main data, you will make very kind >> of simple scientific mistake. > > Likelihood of dorame == aldoraz is now 82%. The number is too high. I doubt she can elide her sexist bigotry based on identity postings. /BAH
From: jmfbahciv on 12 Jan 2010 08:24 Nam Nguyen wrote: > Marshall wrote: >> >> It has been proposed on this thread that math is just a game >> with no significance or utility, except by coincidence (this is >> bullshit.) > > Mathematics is a game of the mind. Which can be written down on paper. > Whether or not that has any utility > or significance, or that is by coincidence, or that is "bullshit" doesn't > matter, to the fact that it's just a game. > Have you done any cost analysis lately? Or materials design? Or built a bridge? Or figured out the load of the roof on your house? /BAH
From: Errol on 12 Jan 2010 08:17 On Jan 12, 11:27 am, Michael Gordge <mikegor...(a)xtra.co.nz> wrote: > On Jan 12, 6:23 pm, Errol <vs.er...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > Forget parrallel lines. The postulate is about two lines that are NOT > > parrallel. > > They can either be converging or diverging. > > So which is it? > > MG Duh! If the lines are NOT parallel, then they must diverge on one end and converge on the other. The postulate says the sum of the angles of a line dissecting the lines will be less than 180 degrees on the converging side and by default greater than 180 degrees on the diverging side.
From: Errol on 12 Jan 2010 08:20 On Jan 12, 1:58 pm, Zinnic <zeenr...(a)gate.net> wrote: > On Jan 12, 3:27 am, Michael Gordge <mikegor...(a)xtra.co.nz> wrote: > > > On Jan 12, 6:23 pm, Errol <vs.er...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Forget parrallel lines. The postulate is about two lines that are NOT > > > parrallel. > > > They can either be converging or diverging. > > > So which is it? > > > MG > > Me? Damn! Just missed it! From the name calling and anger in this thread I will try be number 10 000
From: PD on 12 Jan 2010 10:45
On Jan 11, 5:16 pm, dorayme <doraymeRidT...(a)optusnet.com.au> wrote: > > Now I am done with you, I pass you over to the good Patricia who can > kick you in the balls when she has time to look at Google Groupers, you > have forfeited the right to appear in my newsreader. > > Bye! Bye-bye! Enjoy your bile tea! |