Dpreview, not just whores, but CHEAP whores to boot!
in [Digital Cameras]
|
From: John McWilliams on 25 May 2010 02:16 Wolfgang Weasleburg wrote: > How much equipment is too much if you believe that more equipment equals > better photography? Well, and I know you're not the real Wolfie, I don't know anyone who subscribes to the above premise. -- lsmft
From: John Navas on 25 May 2010 11:46 On Mon, 24 May 2010 23:16:23 -0700, John McWilliams <jpmcw(a)comcast.net> wrote in <htfpvn$v5n$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>: >Wolfgang Weasleburg wrote: > >> How much equipment is too much if you believe that more equipment equals >> better photography? > >... I don't know anyone who >subscribes to the above premise. Then you must not be following here, because several such people are posting here. I'd even hazard a guess they are in the majority here, or at least their posts are. -- Best regards, John Buying a dSLR doesn't make you a photographer, it makes you a dSLR owner. "The single most important component of a camera is the twelve inches behind it." -Ansel Adams
From: John McWilliams on 25 May 2010 14:40 John Navas wrote: > On Mon, 24 May 2010 23:16:23 -0700, John McWilliams <jpmcw(a)comcast.net> > wrote in <htfpvn$v5n$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>: > >> Wolfgang Weasleburg wrote: >> >>> How much equipment is too much if you believe that more equipment equals >>> better photography? >> ... I don't know anyone who >> subscribes to the above premise. > > Then you must not be following here, because several such people are > posting here. I'd even hazard a guess they are in the majority here, > or at least their posts are. Name them, John. I am quite sure you'll post a 'reason' to not do so, avoid replying, or use another duck and cover tactic. Do prove me wrong! -- john mcwilliams
From: John Navas on 25 May 2010 14:46 On Tue, 25 May 2010 11:40:06 -0700, John McWilliams <jpmcw(a)comcast.net> wrote in <hth5i7$vn3$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>: >John Navas wrote: >> On Mon, 24 May 2010 23:16:23 -0700, John McWilliams <jpmcw(a)comcast.net> >> wrote in <htfpvn$v5n$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>: >> >>> Wolfgang Weasleburg wrote: >>> >>>> How much equipment is too much if you believe that more equipment equals >>>> better photography? >>> ... I don't know anyone who >>> subscribes to the above premise. >> >> Then you must not be following here, because several such people are >> posting here. I'd even hazard a guess they are in the majority here, >> or at least their posts are. > >Name them, John. >I am quite sure you'll post a 'reason' to not do so, avoid replying, or >use another duck and cover tactic. >Do prove me wrong! If you sincerely want an answer, then you'll have to eschew your usual slurs, which only serve to persuade me you're not worth answering. -- Best regards, John Buying a dSLR doesn't make you a photographer, it makes you a dSLR owner. "The single most important component of a camera is the twelve inches behind it." -Ansel Adams
From: John McWilliams on 26 May 2010 01:23
John Navas wrote: > On Tue, 25 May 2010 11:40:06 -0700, John McWilliams <jpmcw(a)comcast.net> > wrote in <hth5i7$vn3$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>: > >> John Navas wrote: >>> On Mon, 24 May 2010 23:16:23 -0700, John McWilliams <jpmcw(a)comcast.net> >>> wrote in <htfpvn$v5n$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>: >>> >>>> Wolfgang Weasleburg wrote: >>>> >>>>> How much equipment is too much if you believe that more equipment equals >>>>> better photography? >>>> ... I don't know anyone who >>>> subscribes to the above premise. >>> Then you must not be following here, because several such people are >>> posting here. I'd even hazard a guess they are in the majority here, >>> or at least their posts are. >> Name them, John. >> I am quite sure you'll post a 'reason' to not do so, avoid replying, or >> use another duck and cover tactic. >> Do prove me wrong! > > If you sincerely want an answer, then you'll have to eschew your usual > slurs, which only serve to persuade me you're not worth answering. O.k., it was the duck and cover manoeuver this time. BTW, there's no slur here, just saying what's true. Thanks for coming through as predicted. I guess.... You still can't name them. -- lsmft |