Prev: NEWS: Sizing up the iPhone 4 for shutterbugs
Next: Latest super-efficient sensor claim
From: Bruce on 18 Jun 2010 05:31
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 20:55:27 -0500, LOL! <lol(a)lol.org> wrote:
>That's a nice psychotic tech-head's, crapshooter's, snapshooter's, hardware
>worshipper's, auto-everything dependent, beginner novice's theory but it is
>total nonsense.
>
>Keep trying to justify why you can't take a picture without auto-focus nor
>auto-exposure capability in every one of your cameras.
>
>Because .... YOU'RE FUCKIN' LOSER CRAPSHOOTER!
>
>That's why. It's that fuckin' simple!
>
>LOL!


Probably the greatest benefit of your repetitive posting style is that
you can very quickly copy and paste your latest message from a small
selection of standard insults.

From: whisky-dave on 18 Jun 2010 08:40

"Rich" <none(a)nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:tvqdnRD0AInIXofRnZ2dnUVZ_sudnZ2d(a)giganews.com...

> People who think tool quality doesn't matter are simply wrong.

Is that what she keeps telling you ;-)


From: John Navas on 18 Jun 2010 09:36
On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 02:15:41 -0500, in
<n67m161vq5dd9ulq268msn0ifomq7gvkhj(a)4ax.com>, James Nagler
<jnagler(a)spamproofed.net> wrote:

>On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 21:31:53 -0700 (PDT), Rich <rander3127(a)gmail.com>
>wrote:

>>P&S's are kitchen-sink cameras, everything attempted to be thrown into
>>one crappy package, jacks of all trade, master's of none. So, who is
>>dependent on what?
>
>I can take (and have taken) award winning photographs with a
>Brownie-Box camera if I so desire. Can't you?

"It's a poor workman who blames his tools."
From: John McWilliams on 18 Jun 2010 13:23
John Navas wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 02:15:41 -0500, in
> <n67m161vq5dd9ulq268msn0ifomq7gvkhj(a)4ax.com>, James Nagler
> <jnagler(a)spamproofed.net> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 21:31:53 -0700 (PDT), Rich <rander3127(a)gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>
>>> P&S's are kitchen-sink cameras, everything attempted to be thrown into
>>> one crappy package, jacks of all trade, master's of none. So, who is
>>> dependent on what?
>> I can take (and have taken) award winning photographs with a
>> Brownie-Box camera if I so desire. Can't you?
>
> "It's a poor workman who blames his tools."

Well, "James" will never show his images or his tools.
The quote: one of my favs.

--
John McWilliams
From: Neil Harrington on 18 Jun 2010 13:41

"John McWilliams" <jpmcw(a)comcast.net> wrote in message
news:hvga1q$dna$2(a)news.eternal-september.org...
> John Navas wrote:
>> On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 02:15:41 -0500, in
>> <n67m161vq5dd9ulq268msn0ifomq7gvkhj(a)4ax.com>, James Nagler
>> <jnagler(a)spamproofed.net> wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 21:31:53 -0700 (PDT), Rich <rander3127(a)gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>
>>>> P&S's are kitchen-sink cameras, everything attempted to be thrown into
>>>> one crappy package, jacks of all trade, master's of none. So, who is
>>>> dependent on what?
>>> I can take (and have taken) award winning photographs with a
>>> Brownie-Box camera if I so desire. Can't you?
>>
>> "It's a poor workman who blames his tools."
>
> Well, "James" will never show his images or his tools.
> The quote: one of my favs.

I suspect the only creativity "James" can boast is endlessly inventing new
names for himself and flooding the newsgroups with troll-guano.


 |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3
Prev: NEWS: Sizing up the iPhone 4 for shutterbugs
Next: Latest super-efficient sensor claim