From: George's Pro Sound Co. on 8 May 2010 09:52 "Tim Perry" <timperry(a)donespameroadrunner.com> wrote in message news:hs2mt2$43c$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... > > >> I was thinking another Beta 58a would make sense. As with two similar >> mikes I would have less variables to deal with. I also wouldn't have >> people stating their preference for one mike vs the other. >> >> Still not sure what to do for an instrument mike that would see >> occasional vocal use. Might buy the Shure Beta 57. Guy at GC spoke >> highly of the Audix i5. >> >> Danielle >> > > As a former i5 owner: its a terrible vocal mic. First one I bought was so > bad I though it was broken and exchanged it with the same result. It did > fairly well on loud guitar cabinets. > > The beta 57 is a excellent all around mic, I can't think of a mic I like on more diffrent instruments AND vocals than the beta 57 George
From: DanielleOM on 8 May 2010 10:17 "George's Pro Sound Co." <bmoas(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message news:l_GdnZYYpNU58XjWnZ2dnUVZ_qudnZ2d(a)earthlink.com... > > "Tim Perry" <timperry(a)donespameroadrunner.com> wrote in message > news:hs2mt2$43c$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... >> > >>> I was thinking another Beta 58a would make sense. As with two similar >>> mikes I would have less variables to deal with. I also wouldn't have >>> people stating their preference for one mike vs the other. >>> >>> Still not sure what to do for an instrument mike that would see >>> occasional vocal use. Might buy the Shure Beta 57. Guy at GC spoke >>> highly of the Audix i5. >>> >>> Danielle >>> >> >> As a former i5 owner: its a terrible vocal mic. First one I bought was so >> bad I though it was broken and exchanged it with the same result. It did >> fairly well on loud guitar cabinets. >> >> > The beta 57 is a excellent all around mic, I can't think of a mic I like > on more diffrent instruments AND vocals than the beta 57 > George > Thanks George The Beta 57 was one I was thinking of. I have friend that has one and likes it. Danielle
From: Tim Perry on 10 May 2010 22:25 > Thanks George > > The Beta 57 was one I was thinking of. I have friend that has one and > likes it. > > Danielle > You might also consider the Samson Q7. Supercard pattern and good sound at about half the price.
From: DanielleOM on 11 May 2010 13:49 "Tim Perry" <timperry(a)donespameroadrunner.com> wrote in message news:hsaf76$kvd$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... > >> Thanks George >> >> The Beta 57 was one I was thinking of. I have friend that has one and >> likes it. >> >> Danielle >> > > You might also consider the Samson Q7. Supercard pattern and good sound > at about half the price. > Tim Thanks for the suggestion. I already bought the Shure beta 57a. Last night it was only used for instrumentals. Danielle
From: Kevin T on 13 May 2010 21:20 On May 11, 1:49 pm, "DanielleOM" <daniell...(a)reply.to.group.com> wrote: > "Tim Perry" <timpe...(a)donespameroadrunner.com> wrote in message > > news:hsaf76$kvd$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... > > > > >> Thanks George > > >> The Beta 57 was one I was thinking of. I have friend that has one and > >> likes it. > > >> Danielle > > > You might also consider the Samson Q7. Supercard pattern and good sound > > at about half the price. > > Tim > > Thanks for the suggestion. I already bought the Shure beta 57a. Last night > it was only used for instrumentals. > > Danielle Don't shoot me please but I was given a thee pack of Berhinger xm8500 that have become my go to indestructable / disposable sm58 clone mic . But Id say if $ is not the issue the Beta 57 ( not 58) would be a great all around mic I have had make some vocalists smile. Kevin T
First
|
Prev
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 Prev: D6 problems Next: Silent cable connectors. Cable sources |