From: JosephKK on 4 Oct 2009 07:46 On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 13:31:23 -0500, Vladimir Vassilevsky <nospam(a)nowhere.com> wrote: > > >Jan Panteltje wrote: > >> On a sunny day (Wed, 30 Sep 2009 10:26:16 -0700 (PDT)) it happened mkr5000 >> <mikerbgr(a)gmail.com> wrote in >> <6710fdbd-7150-4c96-a548-6f0477a43177(a)g19g2000yqo.googlegroups.com>: >> >> >>>I'll be darn -- don't know why I haven't considered that before and >>>for >>>a power amp you don't want a regulated supply. >>> >>>Is the added ripple a problem? >> >> >> No problem, that chip has good supply rejection, typical 70 dB. > >BTW, 70dB is not much at all for audio purposes. > >There is a problem. The consumption of the audio amp is not symmetrical. >There is going to be significant DC current in the transformer, and the >rail voltage unbalance as well. I would unrecommend using that kind of >voltage doubler for audio power amp. Use the traditional diode bridge >with center tap, or the single supply bridged amp topology. > >Vladimir Vassilevsky >DSP and Mixed Signal Design Consultant >http://www.abvolt.com Well one end of the transformer is connected only to capacitors, how do you get a DC current in the transformer?
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Prev: battery chargers, again Next: Orcad Capture 15.7 and BOM generation with hierarchical designs |