From: Bacle on 21 Nov 2009 23:00 Hi, everyone. I would appreciate your help with the following: I wonder if I am missing something obvious re the idea of hypothesis-testing for regression; specifically, we are testing whether y and x are linearly-related. My layout always assumes the null hypothesis Ho to be that there is no linear relation, i.e., that the slope of the regression line y=bo+b1x is zero. Question: why isn't it enough to just calculate the correlation coefficient r from the data.?. I just don't see what we gain by using the test statistic: t=b1/s_b1 (Note that we are assuming b=0 in Ho, so that we are actually using t=(b1-0)/s_b1 Where y=bo+b1x is the regression line of y by x, i.e., b1 is the slope of the least-squares line , and s_b1 is the sample standard deviation of b1. Doesn't the correlation coefficient r give us the necessary information to decide whether there is a linear relation between y and x.? Thanks.
From: Ray Koopman on 23 Nov 2009 00:58 On Nov 22, 9:40 pm, Bacle <ba...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > Anyone.? The two tests are equivalent.
From: Ray Koopman on 23 Nov 2009 04:21 On Nov 22, 11:08 pm, Bacle <ba...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> On Nov 22, 9:40 pm, Bacle <ba...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >>> Anyone.? >> >> The two tests are equivalent. > > Thanks, Prof. Koopman. > Wouldn't it be easier to calculate r than to do a hypothesis test.?. > On top of that, a hypothesis test only returns a confidence interval, > while calculating r would give us a definitive answer; a non-zero > coefficient would be a yes, there is a linear relation . > > Is there a reason to do one tewst over the other, or are the tests > basically interchangeable.? Neither b1 nor r is a *test* statistic. They are closely related *descriptive* statistics: b1 = r*s_y/s_x, where s_y and s_x are the sample standard deviations of the y and x variables. The only difference between b1 and r is their units: b1 is in units of y/x, whereas r is unitless. They both need testing. The test statistic is t = b1/s_b1 = r*sqrt[(n-2)/(1-r^2)], with n-2 degrees of freedom. A warning: some people erroneously interpret the form of the t as implying that s_r = sqrt[(1-r^2)/(n-2)]. It is much more complicated than that.
|
Pages: 1 Prev: Multinational business finance Solution manual please??? Next: Another AC anomaly? |