From: N_Cook on 13 Feb 2010 03:53 / A COUPLE have been reunited with pictures from a camera they dropped overboard on an Atlantic cruise, thanks to an Oxfordshire woman. South Africans Barbara and Dennis Gregory were en route from New York to Southampton on the Queen Mary 2 in 2008 when they dropped their camera in the ocean. But 16 months later Spanish fisherman Benito Estevez found the camera in his nets with the photos still on the memory card. / Mrs Gregory, 53, said: "I remember the camera getting lost. We were about a day out from Southampton sitting on deck when somebody shouted out there were dolphins. "We jumped up and rushed to the side and it happened - Dennis didn't have the camera strapped round his neck and it slipped out of his hands. "It literally bounced off his lap, across the deck and into the water with hardly a splash and it was gone. / http://www.oxfordmail.co.uk/news/headlines/5006204.Friends_get_reunited_with _lost_photos/
From: William Sommerwerck on 13 Feb 2010 10:07 > That's interesting. I haven't had an SD card fail that I recall. How do you define "failure"? Malfunction after abuse? A well-sealed card might continue to operate even after a salt-water dunking, and a poorly-sealed card after same, followed by a thorough rinsing in fresh water (then by a drying). Of course, the memory cells can only be written to and erased a finite number of times. Each card supposedly has its own internal OS that handles "leveling" -- seeing to it that the cells are written to and erased evenly. Even so, I let my camera cards fill up before transferring their contents to a hard drive or Zip disk. Then I erase and reformat the card.
From: Arfa Daily on 13 Feb 2010 20:27 "William Sommerwerck" <grizzledgeezer(a)comcast.net> wrote in message news:hl6f8n$j69$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... >> That's interesting. I haven't had an SD card fail that I recall. > > How do you define "failure"? Malfunction after abuse? A well-sealed card > might continue to operate even after a salt-water dunking, and a > poorly-sealed card after same, followed by a thorough rinsing in fresh > water > (then by a drying). > > Of course, the memory cells can only be written to and erased a finite > number of times. Each card supposedly has its own internal OS that handles > "leveling" -- seeing to it that the cells are written to and erased > evenly. > Even so, I let my camera cards fill up before transferring their contents > to > a hard drive or Zip disk. Then I erase and reformat the card. > > Interesting that you reuse the cards. Although I transfer my images to the computer for display and manipulation, I let my SD cards fill right up, and then just archive them. They thus become the electronic equivalent of all my old 'negs' from when I used a 35mm SLR. SD cards are now so cheap that it seems pointless to reuse them, when they can serve as the primary backup for all of your photos. Arfa
|
Pages: 1 Prev: repairing a dead Panasonic RF-B60 portable radio Next: LCR capacitors UK |