From: Anton Success on
On Jul 23, 2:21 am, General Schvantzkoph <schvantzk...(a)yahoo.com>
wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 23:08:47 -0700, Squat'n Dive wrote:
> > Having looked at the prices for the proper cases and given ecc
> > unavailability on X58 I started looking down the beaten path of buying a
> > xeon box configured online. Looked on hp small business site and started
> > cherry picking parts for Z800 workstation: configurator says ECC (DDR
> > 1333) is not supported by any 64 bit OS?!????
> > Correct me if i'mw wrong but I was thinking ECC is entirely hardware
> > business. No?
>
> > If I build an X48 bases machine with an older core duo/quad would i have
> > the same issues with ECC
> > support as on Xeon platform?
>
> > Disclaimer: I don't work for hp but i do own a few grand worth of their
> > stock
>
> ECC is supported on X58 systems. For example this SuperMicro motherboard
> has ECC listed in it's specs,
>
> http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813182165
>
> I'm pretty sure that all server motherboards support ECC.

people would buy that and use it for anything but xeon and ecc ram????
there are reviews from customers who bought a server board and stuffed
it
with i7 and non ecc ram!?!!

I have no need to PCIX slots (home system, and, besides, most SAS
controllers
are pci express based these days anyway)
From: Anton Success on
On Jul 22, 8:01 pm, Aragorn <arag...(a)chatfactory.invalid> wrote:
> On Thursday 22 July 2010 08:08 in comp.os.linux.hardware, somebody
> identifying as Squat'n Dive wrote...
>
> > Having looked at the prices for the proper cases and given ecc
> > unavailability on X58 I started looking down the beaten
> > path of buying a xeon box configured online. Looked on hp small
> > business site and started cherry picking parts for Z800 workstation:
> > configurator says ECC (DDR 1333) is not supported by any 64 bit
> > OS?!????
> > Correct me if i'mw wrong but I was thinking ECC is entirely hardware
> > business. No?
>
> Yes, you are correct.  However, the operating system must be able to
> report ECC errors via the system logger, and it is possible that the
> hardware monitoring chip is still too new to be supported by 64-bit
> operating systems (albeit that I'd find it extremely weird, since it
> has nothing to do with the "bitness").  
>
> Still, I don't believe that any 64-bit operating system still exists
> that would be uncapable of logging such errors.  GNU/Linux certainly
> can, and why would HP release a chip that's not supported "by any
> 64-bit OS", when all of their hardware is 64-bit capable?
>
> > If I build an X48 bases machine with an older core duo/quad would i
> > have the same issues with ECC support as on Xeon platform?
>
> Can't answer that, sorry.  I've opted for AMD Opterons in my 64-bit
> machine, which has a Tyan motherboard and uses DDR-2 at 553 MHz (or
> otherwise put, pc5300). ;-)

The idea was to use core duo/quad on the cheap instead of xeons in X48

>
> That said, I don't know whether the Core Duo or Core Quad architecture
> is socket-compatible with the Xeons.  They might not be, because of the

Even if they were which i don't believe they are i would not want to
test
the socket compatibility by stuffing a desktop cpu into a server board
and vice versa.
Though judging by supermicro xeon x58 board reviews there is no
shortage of people
who would. Is not a P55 based board a much cheaper route for those
folk?