Prev: Concurrent MERGE
Next: Needs Suggestion
From: Boszormenyi Zoltan on 5 Aug 2010 12:24
Alvaro Herrera írta:
> Excerpts from Michael Meskes's message of jue ago 05 05:39:46 -0400 2010:
>
>> Sorry I thought Zoltan's explanation was clear enough. All prior ECPG versions were fine because dynamic cursor names were only added in 9.0. Apparently only this one place was missed. So this is a bug in the new feature, however not such a major one that it warrants the complete removal IMO. I'd prefer to fix this in 9.0.1.
>>
>
> Since we're still in the beta phase, it makes sense to apply the fix
> right now so that it appears in 9.0. No point in waiting for 9.0.1.
>

It boils down to the fact that Michael doesn't have too much time
and no one else knows ECPG in depth. So...


--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: Concurrent MERGE
Next: Needs Suggestion