From: ebony on 30 Jan 2010 10:14 On Fri, 29 Jan 2010 21:20:32 -0600, in alt.comp.freeware >Q< wrote: > In <news:20100128200352.17e480ed(a)bellgrove.remarqs.net>, > »Q« <boxcars(a)gmx.net> wrote: > >> In <news:hjt9sn$c5s$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>, >> Craig <netburgher(a)REMOVEgmail.com> wrote: > > > Enough of that. Now everybody go freak out about > <http://whattheinternetknowsaboutyou.com/>. Greeting. What does the page find for you? I see no-thing of concern. I ask in peace. -- Reply online
From: Wheel on 30 Jan 2010 21:20 UnsteadyKen wrote: > Wheel said... > >> Thanks for giving some more numbers, but it's making less >> and less sense the more I try to make sense of it. > > Same here. > >> I take it you meant: >> >> Off by One: -One in 68,288 > 16.06 > > Yep. > > Just tried Off by One again and got this... > > Within our dataset of several hundred thousand visitors, only one in > 64,596 browsers have the same fingerprint as yours. > > Currently, we estimate that your browser has a fingerprint that conveys > 15.98 bits of identifying information. > > It seems to be getting better, or worse? > Perhaps a bit fell off Off by One putting the numbers off by one or 2 > bits. To my way of thinking; One in 1 is ideal, as your fingerprint would be the same as everyone else, making you indistinguishable. I'm so far still unique (Total / One in...), but how this info' is used to track me, with an internet facing IP that hundreds use is unclear. I'm not that bothered. It's like playing hide and seek; I don't want you to know where I am, but if you do, so what. Anyway, I'm back in training, readying for air travel, and the soon to be installed, 'Home Shower-Cams'. :)
From: POKO on 31 Jan 2010 11:38 In article <%N59n.69341$ni7.37483(a)newsfe24.ams2>, tyre(a)hub.axle says... > UnsteadyKen wrote: > > Wheel said... > > > >> Thanks for giving some more numbers, but it's making less > >> and less sense the more I try to make sense of it. > > > > Same here. > > > >> I take it you meant: > >> > >> Off by One: -One in 68,288 > 16.06 > > > > Yep. > > > > Just tried Off by One again and got this... > > > > Within our dataset of several hundred thousand visitors, only one in > > 64,596 browsers have the same fingerprint as yours. > > > > Currently, we estimate that your browser has a fingerprint that conveys > > 15.98 bits of identifying information. > > > > It seems to be getting better, or worse? > > Perhaps a bit fell off Off by One putting the numbers off by one or 2 > > bits. > > To my way of thinking; One in 1 is ideal, as your fingerprint > would be the same as everyone else, making you indistinguishable. > > I'm so far still unique (Total / One in...), but how this info' > is used to track me, with an internet facing IP that hundreds > use is unclear. I'm not that bothered. It's like playing hide > and seek; I don't want you to know where I am, but if you do, > so what. > > Anyway, I'm back in training, readying for air travel, and the > soon to be installed, 'Home Shower-Cams'. :) > > Certain parties here can hardly wait to see you shower, :) -- Best - POKO Manitoulin Island, Canada
From: Wheel on 31 Jan 2010 13:29 POKO wrote: >> UnsteadyKen wrote: >>> Yep. >>> >>> Just tried Off by One again and got this... >>> >>> Within our dataset of several hundred thousand visitors, only one in >>> 64,596 browsers have the same fingerprint as yours. >>> >>> Currently, we estimate that your browser has a fingerprint that conveys >>> 15.98 bits of identifying information. >>> >>> It seems to be getting better, or worse? >>> Perhaps a bit fell off Off by One putting the numbers off by one or 2 >>> bits. >> To my way of thinking; One in 1 is ideal, as your fingerprint >> would be the same as everyone else, making you indistinguishable. >> >> I'm so far still unique (Total / One in...), but how this info' >> is used to track me, with an internet facing IP that hundreds >> use is unclear. I'm not that bothered. It's like playing hide >> and seek; I don't want you to know where I am, but if you do, >> so what. >> >> Anyway, I'm back in training, readying for air travel, and the >> soon to be installed, 'Home Shower-Cams'. :) >> >> > Certain parties here can hardly wait to see you shower, > :) Excellent! There's some twisted minds around here. :) Thank you for the belly laugh.
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Prev: TeboCam - portable Next: [GNOME] Florence: extensible & scalable virtual keyboard |