Prev: SPACEBALLS FOUND IN DISTANT GALAXY
Next: correlating Double Slit Experiment with Tifft quantization Chapt7 Tifft quantized galaxy speeds, #230 Atom Totality
From: Pentcho Valev on 23 Jul 2010 01:56 http://www.pitt.edu/~jdnorton/teaching/HPS_0410/chapters/big_bang/index.html John Norton: "If the observer were to hurry towards the source of the light, the observer would now pass wavecrests more frequently than the resting observer. That would mean that moving observer would find the frequency of the light to have increased (and correspondingly for the wavelength--the distance between crests--to have decreased). That increase in frequency is a shifting of the light towards the blue end of the spectrum. The converse effect would happen if the observer were to recede from the light source. The light's frequency would diminish and the light would redden. For light, this effect depends only on the relative motion of observer and source. So if the observer were at rest and the light source moved, exactly the same thing would happen." John Norton would have produced a revolutionary text if he had not used the variable wavelength camouflage. Here is the text without the camouflage: "If the observer were to hurry towards the source of the light, the observer would now pass wavecrests more frequently than the resting observer. That would mean that moving observer would find the frequency of the light to have increased (AND CORRESPONDINGLY FOR THE SPEED OF THE LIGHT RELATIVE TO HIM TO HAVE INCREASED AS WELL). That increase in frequency is a shifting of the light towards the blue end of the spectrum. The converse effect would happen if the observer were to recede from the light source. The light's frequency would diminish and the light would redden. For light, this effect depends only on the relative motion of observer and source. So if the observer were at rest and the light source moved, exactly the same thing would happen." Etherists do not use the variable wavelength camouflage and accordingly do produce revolutionary texts from time to time: http://redshift.vif.com/JournalFiles/V17NO1PDF/V17N1GIF.pdf Doppler Shift Reveals Light Speed Variation Stephan J. G. Gift Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering The University of the West Indies "Therefore the observed Doppler Shift or frequency change in the light or other electromagnetic radiation resulting from movement of the receiver toward the transmitter indicates a change in light speed relative to the moving receiver. (...) In conclusion, a change in radiation frequency or Doppler Shift occurs when an observer moving at speed v much lower than c towards or away from a stationary source intercepts electromagnetic waves from that source. This frequency change arises because the observer intercepts the electromagnetic radiation at a relative speed c ± v that is different from the light speed c. Though special relativity predicts the Doppler Shift, this light speed variation c ± v occurring in this situation directly contradicts the light speed invariance requirement of special relativity." Pentcho Valev pvalev(a)yahoo.com
From: Pentcho Valev on 23 Jul 2010 10:11 http://www.online-literature.com/orwell/1984/ George Orwell "1984": "In the end the Party would announce that two and two made five, and you would have to believe it. It was inevitable that they should make that claim sooner or later: the logic of their position demanded it. Not merely the validity of experience, but the very existence of external reality, was tacitly denied by their philosophy. The heresy of heresies was common sense. And what was terrifying was not that they would kill you for thinking otherwise, but that they might be right. For, after all, how do we know that two and two make four? Or that the force of gravity works? Or that the past is unchangeable? If both the past and the external world exist only in the mind, and if the mind itself is controllable what then?" In Big Brother's schizophrenic world you are free to replace the theory predicting that 2+2=5 with a new theory predicting that, say, 2+2=17. However you are not allowed to return to the old theory predicting that 2+2=4. That would be a crime against the civilization. Similarly, in Einsteiniana's schizophrenic world you are not allowed to denounce Einstein's 1905 false light postulate (c'=c) and return to its true alternative given by Newton's emission theory of light - the equation c'=c+v showing how the speed of light varies with the speed of the emitter. Our decaying civilization may not be able to withstand such a blow: http://www.ekkehard-friebe.de/wallace.htm Bryan Wallace: "Einstein's special relativity theory with his second postulate that the speed of light in space is constant is the linchpin that holds the whole range of modern physics theories together. Shatter this postulate, and modern physics becomes an elaborate farce! (...) The speed of light is c+v." But you are free to try to replace Einstein's "theory" with an equivalent or even greater idiocy - that would additionally confuse scientists' minds and so would strengthen Einsteiniana: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-lanza/spiritual-living_b_650940.html "Did Einstein Set Science Back 100 Years? (...) Einstein's treatment of space and time as physical objects imparts a completely wrong starting point for investigations into the nature of reality. (...) Relativity and biocentrism both predict the same phenomena. It's not possible to choose one theory over the other based on experiments. "One must choose relativity over the compensatory [biocentric] alternatives," wrote Sklar, a leading philosopher of science "as a matter of free choice." But with biocentrism, there's no need to invent new dimensions and an entirely new mathematics to explain why space and time are relative to the observer. (...) Science needs to restore space and time to their rightful place. They belong to us, not to the physical world." Pentcho Valev pvalev(a)yahoo.com
From: Jacko on 23 Jul 2010 16:19 We all know it's possible to construct theories of 'relativity' where the speed of light is not constant but is still a measured invariant. That's why it's m/s and not dimensionless.
From: BURT on 23 Jul 2010 17:35 On Jul 23, 1:19 pm, Jacko <jackokr...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > We all know it's possible to construct theories of 'relativity' where > the speed of light is not constant but is still a measured invariant. > That's why it's m/s and not dimensionless. When lightening strikes the train moves down the tracks. Mitch Raemsch
From: Bob Myers on 23 Jul 2010 18:23
BURT wrote: > On Jul 23, 1:19 pm, Jacko <jackokr...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> We all know it's possible to construct theories of 'relativity' where >> the speed of light is not constant but is still a measured invariant. >> That's why it's m/s and not dimensionless. > > When lightening strikes the train moves down the tracks. So what happens to the train when darkening strikes? Bob M. |