From: blue on 25 Apr 2010 19:48 Like seeing things in passing clouds our erstwhile poster sees them in lumps of coal instead. He has sent these to many academics until his reputation is made, but one he reather not have.
From: Brad Guth on 25 Apr 2010 21:02 On Apr 25, 4:48 pm, b...(a)coal.com wrote: > Like seeing things in passing clouds our erstwhile poster sees them in > lumps of coal instead. > > He has sent these to many academics until his reputation is made, but > one he reather not have. Why didn't you say that you work for those Rothschilds? ~ BG
From: montygraham on 25 Apr 2010 22:31 Please state your hypothesis in detail. Also, if you think that you are refuting a theory, please specify the theory and a few pieces of evidence that you believe to be very strong and that were published in scientific journals. At that point, I will examine you notions in detail.
From: blue on 26 Apr 2010 07:56 > Like seeing things in passing clouds our erstwhile poster sees them in > lumps of coal instead. > > He has sent these to many academics until his reputation is made, but > one he reather not have. "Why didn't you say that you work for those Rothschilds?" Because to make the world wide conspiracy work we must remain hidden behind the scenes.
From: Brad Guth on 26 Apr 2010 22:24
On Apr 26, 4:56 am, b...(a)coal.com wrote: > > Like seeing things in passing clouds our erstwhile poster sees them in > > lumps of coal instead. > > > He has sent these to many academics until his reputation is made, but > > one he reather not have. > > "Why didn't you say that you work for those Rothschilds?" > > Because to make the world wide conspiracy work we must remain hidden > behind the scenes. Understood. |