From: blue on
Like seeing things in passing clouds our erstwhile poster sees them in
lumps of coal instead.

He has sent these to many academics until his reputation is made, but
one he reather not have.
From: Brad Guth on
On Apr 25, 4:48 pm, b...(a)coal.com wrote:
> Like seeing things in passing clouds our erstwhile poster sees them in
> lumps of coal instead.
>
> He has sent these to many academics until his reputation is made, but
> one he reather not have.

Why didn't you say that you work for those Rothschilds?

~ BG
From: montygraham on
Please state your hypothesis in detail. Also, if you think that you
are refuting a theory, please specify the theory and a few pieces of
evidence that you believe to be very strong and that were published in
scientific journals. At that point, I will examine you notions in
detail.
From: blue on
> Like seeing things in passing clouds our erstwhile poster sees them in
> lumps of coal instead.
>
> He has sent these to many academics until his reputation is made, but
> one he reather not have.

"Why didn't you say that you work for those Rothschilds?"

Because to make the world wide conspiracy work we must remain hidden
behind the scenes.

From: Brad Guth on
On Apr 26, 4:56 am, b...(a)coal.com wrote:
> > Like seeing things in passing clouds our erstwhile poster sees them in
> > lumps of coal instead.
>
> > He has sent these to many academics until his reputation is made, but
> > one he reather not have.
>
> "Why didn't you say that you work for those Rothschilds?"
>
> Because to make the world wide conspiracy work we must remain hidden
> behind the scenes.

Understood.