Prev: Rehabilitation of the country’s first CO2-exile
Next: simple question power, resistance, current, etc
From: JT on 18 Feb 2010 19:00
Imagine object A and B travelling parallell vectors in space, A
travels 0.1 c and B travel 0.9 c.

For some reason the both pass lined up between sensor C and D at same
moment x, when the sensor beams reach their front both ships emit one
puls forward and one puls backward.

The four lightpulses can not possible travel invarian thru the space
of C and D, for them to travel invariant in C and D space they must
travel parallell forever.

And if they do there something weird going on within A and B,
especially the light do not spread uniform around B the light puls
infront is contracted and expands at c-v=0.1 c relative restframe B in
the space and the lightfront at back expands at 1.9 c relative B.

The expansion of the two lightpulses is not uniform and invariant in
frame B unless there is shorter meters at the front then at the back.
At even higher velocities like 0.999... c the deformation is even
clearer.

For example consider that the two light pulses have been travelling
for a year after B passed between C and D and emitted the two pulses
now B suddenly come to halt/stop. Now anyone must surely realise that
the pulses never traveled invariant at B and at speed c to begin with.
One pulse is a lightyear away the other one is just in front off B.

The assertions of SR is ridculous i would go so far to say they are a
deliberate hoax.

JT
From: JT on 18 Feb 2010 19:08
On 19 Feb, 01:00, JT <jonas.thornv...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> Imagine object A and B travelling parallell vectors in space, A
> travels 0.1 c and B travel 0.9 c.
>
> For some reason the both pass lined up between sensor C and D at same
> moment x, when the sensor beams reach their front both ships emit one
> puls forward and one puls backward.
>
> The four lightpulses can not possible travel invarian thru the space
> of C and D, for them to travel invariant in C and D space they must
> travel parallell forever.
>
> And if they do there something weird going on within A and B,
> especially the light do not spread uniform around B the light puls
> infront is contracted and expands at c-v=0.1 c relative restframe B in
> the space and the lightfront at back expands at 1.9 c relative B.
>
> The expansion of the two lightpulses is not uniform and invariant in
> frame B unless there is shorter meters at the front then at the back.
> At even higher velocities like 0.999... c the deformation is even
> clearer.
>
> For example consider that the two light pulses have been travelling
> for a year after B passed between C and D and emitted the two pulses
> now B suddenly come to halt/stop. Now anyone must surely realise that
> the pulses never traveled invariant at B and at speed c to begin with.
> One pulse is a lightyear away the other one is just in front off B.
>
> The assertions of SR is ridculous i would go so far to say they are a
> deliberate hoax.
>
> JT

Ooops was that variant lightspeed, well well....
From: JT on 18 Feb 2010 19:21
On 19 Feb, 01:08, JT <jonas.thornv...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> On 19 Feb, 01:00, JT <jonas.thornv...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Imagine object A and B travelling parallell vectors in space, A
> > travels 0.1 c and B travel 0.9 c.
>
> > For some reason the both pass lined up between sensor C and D at same
> > moment x, when the sensor beams reach their front both ships emit one
> > puls forward and one puls backward.
>
> > The four lightpulses can not possible travel invarian thru the space
> > of C and D, for them to travel invariant in C and D space they must
> > travel parallell forever.
>
> > And if they do there something weird going on within A and B,
> > especially the light do not spread uniform around B the light puls
> > infront is contracted and expands at c-v=0.1 c relative restframe B in
> > the space and the lightfront at back expands at 1.9 c relative B.
>
> > The expansion of the two lightpulses is not uniform and invariant in
> > frame B unless there is shorter meters at the front then at the back.
> > At even higher velocities like 0.999... c the deformation is even
> > clearer.
>
> > For example consider that the two light pulses have been travelling
> > for a year after B passed between C and D and emitted the two pulses
> > now B suddenly come to halt/stop. Now anyone must surely realise that
> > the pulses never traveled invariant at B and at speed c to begin with.
> > One pulse is a lightyear away the other one is just in front off B.
>
> > The assertions of SR is ridculous i would go so far to say they are a
> > deliberate hoax.
>
> > JT
>
> Ooops was that variant lightspeed, well well....- Dölj citerad text -
>
> - Visa citerad text -

Consistency...
From: eric gisse on 18 Feb 2010 20:38
JT wrote:

> Imagine object A and B travelling parallell vectors in space, A
> travels 0.1 c and B travel 0.9 c.

"parallel"

>
> For some reason the both pass lined up

Atrocious grammar.

> between sensor C and D at same
> moment x, when the sensor beams

> reach their front both ships emit one

More atrocious grammar.

> puls forward and one puls backward.

"pulse"

>
> The four lightpulses can not possible travel invarian thru the space

"invariant", "through"

> of C and D, for them to travel invariant in C and D space they must

Learn how to use the period.

> travel parallell forever.

"parallel"

>
> And

Do not start sentences with "and". Improper grammar.

> if they do there something weird going on within A and B,

Muddled thinking. 'if they do, something weird is happening!'

> especially the light do not

"does not". More atrocious grammar.

> spread uniform around B the light puls

You need a comma somewhere, or a new sentence.

Plus its' spelled "pulse"

> infront is contracted and expands at c-v=0.1 c relative restframe B in

You are assuming Galilean addition of velocities. You fail English and
elementary SR.

[snip rest, unread]
From: BURT on 18 Feb 2010 21:46
Light speed is a constant through space. A frame can travel behind or
ahead of light at near light speed.


Mitch Raemsch
 |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2
Prev: Rehabilitation of the country’s first CO2-exile
Next: simple question power, resistance, current, etc